Little words, big meaning – Ideational and pragmatic markers in fictional war discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2025.12.1.zasKeywords:
discourse-pragmatic markers, ideational markers, procedural meaning, LIWC, Bohdan Lepky, fictional war discourseAbstract
War discourse has gained importance amid today’s global instability due to war-related trauma. Because war often involves trauma, its fictional representation may disrupt language coherence. Discourse coherence, marked by specific linguistic cues, helps readers connect ideas. Without such markers, structure remains implicit, potentially hindering interpretation. From this perspective, ideational and pragmatic discourse markers − little linguistic items that structure and organise text − are vital. These connectives have “procedural meaning”, guiding readers towards comprehension with less cognitive effort. This article examines how such words function in fictional non-war and war discourse. Using the Ukrainian version of LIWC2015 and a Welch Two-Sample t-test in R, based on the specific weights of categories in the two sets of texts, it was possible to identify markers of trauma discourse in Bohdan Lepky’s wartime stories. The results showed that war fiction had a statistically significant reduction in both ideational and discourse-pragmatic text coherence signals. Additionally, there was a trend towards higher lexical density and the use of ‘tentative’ words, or ‘mitigation’ pragmatic markers, and ‘affect’ words, including indicators of anxiety with a focus on the present. These findings offer new insights into how discourse markers shape the representation of traumatic experiences in the works of individual authors or fictional characters.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to acknowledge the support of the British Academy in funding this research.
Downloads
References
Anthonissen, C. (2020). Autobiographical narrative of traumatic experience: Disruption and resilience in South African truth commission testimonies. Applied Linguistics, 41(3), 370-388. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaa010
Beaudreau, S. A., Storandt, M., & Strube, M. J. (2006). A comparison of narratives told by younger and older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 32, 105-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03610730500326481
Bifulco, A. (2021). Childhood trauma in women and fragmented interview narratives – Some interdisciplinary methodological and clinical implications. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 8(1), 12–27. https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2021.8.1.bif
Blakemore, D. (2002). Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge University Press.
Busch, B., & McNamara, T. (2020). Language and trauma: An introduction. Applied Linguistics, 41(3), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaa002
Caffi, C. (2013). Mitigation. In M. Sbisà & K. Turner (Eds.), Pragmatics of speech actions (pp. 257-285). De Gruyter Mouton.
Cobley, E. (1995). Postmodernist War Fiction: Findley’s The Wars. Canadian Literature, 147, 98–124. https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2021.8.1.bif
Kočotea, I., & Smirnova, T. (2016). Aspects of military-related text translation from English into Latvian. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 107-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.09.078
Kusumitha, R. (2025). Ruptured minds, fractured verses: The psychodynamics of madness in war poetry. International Journal of Arts, Science and Humanities, 12(S4), 18-24. https://doi.org/10.34293/sijash.v12iS4.May.9146
Lenk, U. (1998). Discourse markers and global coherence in conversation, Journal of Pragmatics, 30(2), 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00027-7
Menne, F., Schäfer, S., Linz, N., Tröger, J., Schwed, L., Ettore, E., & König, A. (2025). Using speech analysis in virtual agent conversations to differentiate PTSD patients from control participants. Psychiatry research, 348, 116486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116486
Pennebaker J.W., Boyd R.L., Jordan K., & Blackburn K. (2015). The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015. University of Texas at Austin.
Pennebaker, J. W., & Seagal, J. D. (1999). Forming a story: The health benefits of narrative. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(10), 1243-1254. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199910)55:10%3C1243::aid-jclp6%3E3.0.co;2-n
Redeker, G. (1990). Ideational and pragmatic markers of discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(3), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90095-U
Searle, J. R. (1975). The Logical Status of Fictional Discourse. New Literary History, 6(2), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.2307/468422
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishing.
Taraban, R., Saraff, S., Zasiekin, S., & Biswal, R. (2022). A psycholinguistic analysis of inter-ethnic views of ethics. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 9(1), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2022.9.1.tar
van der Kolk, B. (2014). The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. Viking.
Zasiekin, S., Zasiekina, L. Altman, E., Hryntus, M. & Kuperman, V. (2025). The narratives of war (NoW) corpus of written testimonies of the Russia-Ukraine war. Language Resources and Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-025-09813-8
Zasiekin, S. (2024). Living through narratives: A psycholinguistic study of war stories by Bohdan Lepky and today’s Ukrainians in print and digital media. Digital Culture & Society, 10(1), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2024-0106
Zasiekin, S., Kuperman, V., Hlova, I., & Zasiekina, L. (2022). War stories in social media: Personal experience of Russia-Ukraine war. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 9(2), 160-170. https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2022.9.2.zas
Zasiekin, S. (2016). Understanding translation universals. Babel, 62(1), 122-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/babel.62.1.07zas
Sources
Gallagher, M. (2016). You Don’t Have to Be a Veteran to Write about War. Retrieved from https://lithub.com/you-dont-have-to-be-a-veteran-to-write-about-war/
Lepky, B. (2011). Vybrani tvory. 2 Volumes. Nadiia Bilyk, Nataliï Havdyda, (Eds.). 2nd ed. Smoloskyp.
Lepky, B. (1905). Кара та інші оповідання [Kara ta Inshi Opovidannia]. Lviv: Ukrainsko-Ruska Vydavnycha Spilka
Lepky, B. (1975). Оповідання [Story-book]. V. Lutsiv, Ed. State College, PA.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Serhii Zasiekin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0