A prospectus for bilingual early reading instruction

Roman Taraban; Isabel Meza; Oksana Lernatovych; Serhii Zasiekin; Sweta Saraff; Ramakrishna Biswal

doi:10.29038/eejpl.2023.10.1.tar

Authors

Roman Taraban * Texas Tech University, USA
Isabel Meza Texas Tech University, USA
Oksana Lernatovych University of Pittsburgh, USA
Serhii Zasiekin Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, Ukraine; University College London, UK
Sweta Saraff Institute of Human Reproduction Kolkata, India
Ramakrishna Biswal National Institute of Technology Rourkela, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2023.10.1.tar

Keywords:

bilingual, decoding, multimedia, technology, tutor, reading, USA, India, Ukraine

Abstract

In this paper, we describe a framework for bilingual decoding instruction, with a call for collaborators. Decoding is the ability to apply knowledge of letter-sound correspondences to pronounce words. We adopt a standard phonological approach for early instruction that could be expanded to include practice with constructive morphemes, like prefixes and suffixes, and reading for meaning. Decades of research have shown that word decoding is a bottleneck in reading comprehension. Unless children develop sight-word reading capabilities, comprehension of texts is severely hampered. The present approach draws on children’s spoken vocabulary knowledge in their native language as a bridge to decoding in a second language. The goal is to develop a tutoring system that draws on current and forthcoming multimedia technologies, and to implement the system in multilingual countries, e.g.: USA, India, Ukraine and across national borders. As a starting point, the authors will use a web platform https://ethicalengineer.ttu.edu designed in 2017 by the USA, Indian, and Ukrainian collaborators, several of them being co-authors of this paper, as a model for the new website for reading instruction. The Ethical Engineer website demonstrates one mechanism through which instructors can reach out to establish connections within and outside their native country around topics and issues of common interest and support educator cooperation and research development. The new model hopes to achieve success comparable to that of the Ethical Engineer. Using computer-based instruction allows for empirical testing of teaching methods, thereby optimizing the educational process. It is important to take advantage of this to ensure the most effective methods are used in early reading instruction for children.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

* Corresponding author: Roman Taraban,

0000-0002-1815-4687

roman.taraban@ttu.edu

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barshay, J., Flynn, H., Sheasley, C., Richman, T., Bazzaz, D., & Griesbach, R. (2021). America’s reading problem: Scores were dropping even before the pandemic. https://hechingerreport.org/americas-reading-problem-scores-were-dropping-even-before-the-pandemic

Bartkiv, N., & Borodin, K. (2015). Yabluko Intermediate Level. Lviv: Ukrainian Catholic University.

Bhattacharjea, S., Wadhwa, W., & Banerji, R. (2011). Inside primary schools. A study of teaching and learning in rural India. ASER Centre.

Bond, G. L., & Dykstra, R. (1967). The cooperative research program in first-grade reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 2(4), 5-142. https://doi.org/10.2307/746948

Burak, M. (2015). Yabluko Elementary Level. Ukrainian Catholic University.

Calfee, R. (2005). The exploration of English orthography. In T. Trabasso, J. Sabatini, D. W. Massaro, and R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Orthography to pedagogy: Essays in honor of Richard L. Venezky (pp. 1-20). Erlbaum Associates.

Calfee, R. C., Miller, R. G., Norman, K., Wilson, K., & Trainin, G. (2013). Learning to do educational research. In M. A. Constas & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Translating theory and research into educational practice (pp. 77-104). Routledge.

Castles, A., Rastle, K., and Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19, 5–51.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271

Chall, J. (1979). The great debate: Ten years later, with a modest proposal for reading stages. In P. A. Weaver & L. B. Resnick (Eds). The theory and practice of early reading: An introduction. Routledge.

Chrabaszcz, A., Anisimova, V., Antropova, J., Bikina, D., Menukhova, A., Mirabo, S., Odnoshivkina, V., Shcherbakova, A., Tikhomirova, A., & Zmiievska, T. (2022). Creating communities of practice for fostering second language learning in people in crisis. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 9(2), 11-28. https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2022.9.2.chr

Culatta, B., Reese, M., & Setzer, L. A. (2006). Early literacy instruction in a dual-language (Spanish—English) kindergarten. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 27(2), 67-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15257401060270020501

Durgunoglu, A. Y., Nagy, W. E., & Hancin-Bhatt, B. J. (1993). Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 453–465.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.453

Dzhura, M. (2007). Vyvchaimo Ukrainsku movu [Let’s Learn the Ukrainian Language]. International Institute of Education, Culture and Diaspora Relations of Lviv Polytechnic.

Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4

Gidikova, B. (2022). UNICEF: Only a third of 10-year-olds globally are estimated to be able to read and understand a simple written story. https://www.unicef.org/bulgaria/en/press-releases/unicef-only-third-10-year-olds-globally-are-estimated-be-able-read-and-understand.

Gidikova, B. (2023). Children from the poorest households benefit the least from nation public education funding – UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/bulgaria/en/press-releases/children-poorest-households-benefit-least-national-public-education-funding-unicef

Goswami, U., Ziegler, J. C., Dalton, L., & Schneider, W. (2003). Nonword reading across orthographies: How flexible is the choice of reading units? Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(2), 235-247. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1017/S0142716403000134

Hassanein, E. E., Johnson, E. S., Ibrahim, S., & Alshaboul, Y. (2023). What predicts word reading in Arabic? Frontiers in Psychology, 14. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1077643

Henry, M. (2012). Structured word inquiry.

https://www.wordworkskingston.com/WordWorks/Home_files/Handout%20for%20IDA%20fall%202012.pdf

Kudriavtseva, N. (2021) Standard Ukrainian in the multilingual context: Language ideologies and current educational practices. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 42(2), 152-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1715990

Kulyk, V. 2017. Language attitudes in independent Ukraine: Differentiation and evolution. In M. S. Flier & A. Graziosi (Eds.), The battle for Ukrainian: A comparative perspective (pp. 309–341). Harvard University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44983544

Lukatska, Y. (2022). Peculiarities of teaching Ukrainian as a foreign language in DSAEU. https://dspace.dsau.dp.ua/handle/123456789/6698

Goswami, U. (1999). Causal connections in beginning reading: The importance of rhyme. Journal of Research in Reading, 22(3), 217-240.

MacLean, M., Bryant, P. E., & Bradley, L. (1987). Rhymes, nursery rhymes and reading in early childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 255–282.

Meza, I. (2023, April). The effect of word neighbors in early reading. Second-year presentations. Department of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University.

Palinska, O., & Turkevych, O. (2010). Krok-1 (level A1-A2). Ukrainska mova yak inozemna. [Ukrainian as a foreign language]. Artos.

Pavlenko, A. (2011). Language Rights Versus Speaker’s Rights: on the Applicability of Western Language Rights Approaches in Eastern European Contexts. Language Policy, 10(1), 37-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-011-9194-7.

Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. Oxford University Press.

Perfetti, C. A. (2017). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, and R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145-174). Routledge.

Perfetti, C. A., & Dunlap, S. (2008). Learning to read: General principles and writing system variations. In K. Koda and A. M. Zehler (Eds.), Learning to read across languages (pp. 25-50). Routledge.

Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. Precursors of Functional Literacy, 11, 67–86.

Pivtorak, H. (2023). Mova Ukrainska. In I. Dziuba, A. Zhykovkyi et al., (Eds.), Entsyklopedia suchasnoyi Ukrainy [The Ukrainian Language. The Encyclopedia of Modern Ukraine]. Kyiv: Institute of Encyclopedic Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. https://esu.com.ua/

Shanahan, T. (2003). Research-based reading instruction: Myths about the National Reading Panel report. The Reading Teacher, 56(7), 646-655.

Snapshot, K. C. D. (2014). Early reading proficiency in the United States. Annie E. Casey Foundation.

Steacy, L. M., Rigobon, V. M., Edwards, A. A., Abes, D. R., Marencin, N. C., Smith, K., et al. (2022). Modeling complex word reading: Examining influences at the level of the word and child on mono-and polymorphemic word reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26, 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2022.2077109

Synchak, O. (2015). Yabluko Advanced Level. Lviv: Ukrainian Catholic University.

Taraban, R., Giussani, A., Marcy, W. M., Terrell, P. A., Saraff, S., & Biswal, R. (2023). Developing globalized petroleum engineers. Proceedings of the 2023 American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference. Baltimore, MD.

Taraban, R., Marcy, W. M., LaCour, M. S., Prasad S. H. C., Zasiekin, S. (2020). Using the web to develop global ethical engineering students. Advances in Engineering Education, 8(3), 1-21. Retrieved from https://advances.asee.org/using-the-web-to-develop-global-ethical-engineering-students/

Venezky, R. L. (1970). The structure of English orthography (Vol. 82). Walter de Gruyter.

Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3.

Sources

ASER Centre. (2019). Annual status of education report (Rural) 2018. ASER Centre.

Ministry of Education (2020). NIPUN Bharat 2020. Government of India. https://NIPUNBharat_web.pdf

National Education Policy (2020).

https://static.pib.gov.in/WriteReadData/userfiles/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf

KIIS (2023a). Level of proficiency in English and other foreign languages in Ukraine: Results of quantitative sociological research conducted in December 2022 - January 2023. International Institute of Sociology. https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports&t=10

KIIS (2023b). Attitude towards the teaching of the Russian language in Ukrainian-language schools: The results of a telephone survey conducted on February 14-22, 2023. International Institute of Sociology. https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=eng&cat=reports&id=1202&page=1&t=10

Ukrainian Census. (2001). http://2001.ukrcensus.gov.ua/eng/results/general/language/

Ukrainian Center for Educational Quality Assessment (2019). Report on the results of the first cycle of the nationwide monitoring study on the quality of primary education. https://testportal.gov.ua//wpcontent/uploads/2019/03/2018_ZVIT_MDYAPO_CHYTANNYA_Sajt-1.pdf

Ukrainian Center for Educational Quality Assessment (2022). Report on the results of the second cycle of the nationwide external monitoring of the quality of primary education.

https://testportal.gov.ua//wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Velykyj-zvit-CHastyna-I.pdf