The Tatar-Russian Bilingualism in Early Childhood
The paper presents findings from psycholinguistic research with normally developing preschool Tatar-Russian bilingual children between the age of 4;0 to 6;0 years old. Forty children in total- twenty children between the age of 4;0 -5;0, and twenty children between the age of 5;0-6;0 were tested. Children with language impairment and mental disabilities were excluded from the study. All children attend a polylingual kindergarten, where the children learn in organized way the following three languages: their mother tongue - the state language of the Tatarstan - the Tatar language, Russian - the official language of the Russian Federation to which Tatarstan belongs, and English. The children were tested with two types of language tests: Syntactic test (wh-complement tests) and mix Tatar-Russian vocabulary test (comprehension and production). They were also tested with a psychological non-verbal Knock Tap test. All children were tested individually in a separate room by a native Tatar speaking and Russian speaking researcher. In order to avoid the influence of the language of testing on the results half of the children were tested with part of the tests in Tatar language and the other part in Russian language. The next day they were changing the languages and the tests. The research question we try to answer is: Do the children develop balanced bilingualism in the kindergarten age having in mind the educational system they are involved in or they are dominant in one of the two languages. The results of the children are analyzed with the ANOVA and SPSS Statistics. They show that the older children are better in all tests. Regarding the language the younger children show poor results in Tatar and better results in Russian. The older children show equally good results in both languages. The paper discusses the classical theory of Skutnabb-Kangas (1981) and newest findings of Bialystok (2020) regarding the bilingualism and bilingual education from early ages and which factors play important role in successful development of balanced bilingualism from early age.
Armon-Lotem, S., Meir, N. (2019). The nature of exposure and input in early bilingualism. In De Houwer, A. & Ortega, L. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingualism. (pp. 193–212). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berta, A. (1998) Tatar and Bashkir. In L. Johanson and E. Csato (Eds.). The Turkic Languages. (pp. 283-300). London and NY: Routledge.
Bialystok, E. (2020) Null results in bilingualism research: What they tell us and what they don’t. Journal of Multilingual Theories and Practices, 1(1), 8-22. https://doi.org/10.1558/jmtp.17104
Bialystok, E. (2009) Bilingualism: The good the bad and the Indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003477
De Houwer, A. (2020) Harmonious Bilingualism: Well-being for families in bilingual settings. In A. Schalley and S. Eisenchlas (Eds.). Handbook of Home Language Maintenance and development. (pp. 63-83). Berlin: De Gruyter.
De Houwer, A. (2005) Early Bilingual Acquisition: Focus on Morphosyntax and the Separate Development Hypotheses. In: Kroll, J. and de Groot, A. M. (Eds.). Handbook of Bilingualism. Psycholinguistic Approaches. (pp. 30-48). Oxford University Press.
De Houwer, A. (2018). The role of language input environments fo language outcomes and language acquisition in young bilinguals. In Miller, D., Bayram, F., Rothman, J. & Serratrice, L. (Eds.). Bilingual Cognition and Language. The state of the science across its subfields. (pp.127-154). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
De Houwer, A. & Ortega, L. (Eds) (2019).The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herkenrath, A. (2011). Wh-Konstruktionen in Turkischen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
Johanson, L. (2006) Tatar. In: K. Brown (Ed.). Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics. Second Edition. (pp. 509-512). Oxford: Elsevier.
Kroll, J. & de Groot, A. M. (Eds) (2005) Handbook of Bilingualism. Psycholinguistic Approaches. NY: Oxfrod University Press.
Kyuchukov, H., Ushakova, O. S., & Yashina, V. I. (2015). Bilingual and multicultural education in Russian kindergartens. Intercultural Education, 26(3), 248-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2015.1048960
Kyuchukov, H., Ushakova, O., & Yashina, V. (2017). The mother tongue in monolingual and multilingual context. Russian Linguistic Bulletin, 4, 16-19. https://doi.org/10.18454/RULB.12.21
Kyuchukov, H., Ushakova, O. & Yashina, V. (2018). Socio-cultural aspects of language acquisition through conversation. Psycholinguistics, 23(1), 189-201. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1217897
Miller, D., Bayram, F., Rothman, J. & Serratrice, L. (Eds). (2018). Bilingual Cognition and Language. The state of the Science Across Its Subfields. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Nicoladis, E. (2018) Simultaneous child bilingualism. In: Miller, D., Bayram, F., Rothman, J. and Serratrice, L. (eds) Bilingual Cognition and Language. The state of the science across its subfields. (pp. 81-102). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Rowland, C., Theakston, A., Ambridge, B., &Twomey, K. (Eds.). (2020). Current Perspectives on Child Language Acquisition. How children use their environment to learn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Schalley, A. & Eisenchlas, S. (Eds.). (2020). Handbook of Home Language Maintenance and development. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Serratrice, L. (2019). Becoming bilingual in early childhood. In: De Houwer, A. and Ortega, L. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingualism. (pp. 15-35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Serratrice, L. (2020). Lessons from studying language development in bilingual children. In Rowland, C., Theakston, A., Ambridge, B., & Twomey, K. (Eds). Current Perspectives on Child Language Acquisition. How children use their environment to learn. (pp. 263-286). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (1981). Bilingualism or Not. The education of Minorities. Hertford: Multilingual Matters.
Tovar-Garcia, E. D. & Podmazin, E. (2018). The impact of socioeconomic status and population size on the use of the Tatar language at home. Intercultural education, 29(1), 122 – 138. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2017.1404740