The relationship between bilingual language control and language dominance: An empirical study of visual language perception

Volodymyr Revniuk; Szilvia Bátyi

doi:10.29038/eejpl.2023.10.2.rev

Authors

Volodymyr Revniuk * University of Pannonia, Hungary
Szilvia Bátyi University of Pannonia, Hungary

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2023.10.2.rev

Keywords:

bilingual, language control, switching cost, language background, visual perception, language dominance

Abstract

Bilingual visual perception is an under-researched area in psycholinguistics and has yielded contradictory results regarding language control. Two theories were developed to account for visual language perception in bilinguals – the Inhibitory Control model (Green, 1986) and the Bilingual Interactive Activation model (Grainger and Dijkstra, 1992). Even though these two accounts have opposite predictions for asymmetrical language control (different for the bilingual’s L1 and L2), most research up to date found evidence only for symmetrical control (Macizo et al., 2012; Orfanidou and Summer, 2005). This study aims to investigate the influence of language dominance on the visual language perception of bilinguals and providing evidence for the accountability of the models mentioned above. Thirty-one Hungarian-English bilinguals were recruited for this study. Participants’ language dominance was operationalized by a complex score using the Bilingual Language Profile questionnaire (Birdsong et al., 2012). The bilingual lexical decision task was used to investigate the differences in the cognitive processing of the two languages. Target stimuli were carefully matched for their visual and linguistic features to eliminate the potential confounding influences on their perception during task performance. For unbalanced, L1 dominant bilinguals, asymmetrical, dominance-related switching cost was observed, indicating the relevance of the Inhibitory Control model. Faster L2 processing correlated with a richer history of L2-associated experiences and more balanced bilingualism. However, no correlations were found with the frequency of language use, language attitudes, and only weak correlations were observed with language proficiency. The current research proposes a methodological framework for measuring the influence of linguistic background on language switching cost that could ensure comparability between further studies.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

* Corresponding author: Volodymyr Revniuk,

0009-0000-8652-4048 ku0dfz@student.uni-pannon.hu

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Altenberg, E. P., & Cairns, H. S. (1983). The effects of phonotactic constraints on lexical processing in bilingual and monolingual subjects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(2), 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90134-2

Borragan, M., Martin, C. D., De Bruin, A., & Duñabeitia, J. A. (2018). Exploring Different Types of Inhibition During Bilingual Language Production. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2256. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02256

Costa, A., & Santesteban, M. (2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 491–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.002

Costa, A., Santesteban, M., & Ivanova, I. (2006). How do highly proficient bilinguals control their lexicalization process? Inhibitory and language-specific selection mechanisms are both functional. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(5), 1057–1074. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1057

de Bot, K., & Schreuder, R. (1993). Word Production and the Bilingual Lexicon. In R. Schreuder & B. Weltens (Eds.), Studies in Bilingualism (Vol. 6, p. 191). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.6.10bot

de Bot, K., & Bátyi, Sz. (2022). Bilingual Models of Speaking. In T. M. Derwing, M. J. Munro, & R. I. Thomson, The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Speaking (1st ed., pp. 9–23). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003022497-3

Filippi, R., Leech, R., Thomas, M. S. C., Green, D. W., & Dick, F. (2012). A bilingual advantage in controlling language interference during sentence comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(4), 858–872. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000708

Gollan, T. H., Weissberger, G. H., Runnqvist, E., Montoya, R. I., & Cera, C. M. (2012). Self-ratings of spoken language dominance: A Multilingual Naming Test (MINT) and preliminary norms for young and aging Spanish–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(3), 594–615. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000332

Grainger, J., & Dijkstra, T. (1992). On the Representation and Use of Language Information in Bilinguals. Advances in Psychology, 83, 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61496-X

Green, D. (1986). Control, activation, and resource: A framework and a model for the control of speech in bilinguals. Brain and Language, 27(2), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(86)90016-7

Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728998000133

Grosjean, F. (1997). The bilingual individual. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting, 2(1–2), 163–187. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.2.1-2.07gro

Heredia, R. R. (1997). Bilingual Memory and Hierarchical Models: A Case for Language Dominance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6(2), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep11512617

Hermans, D., Bongaerts, T., De Bot, K., & Schreuder, R. (1998). Producing words in a foreign language: Can speakers prevent interference from their first language? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(3), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728998000364

Ihász, P., Benyhe, A., Sáry, Gy., Juhász, Z., Navracsics, J. (2023). Visual Word Recognition Patterns of Hungarian-English Bilinguals – Homograph Effect in Bilingual Language Decision. Alkalmazott Nyelvtudomány, XXIII/1, 36–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.18460/ANY.2023.1.003

Jackson, G. M., Swainson, R., Mullin, A., Cunnington, R., & Jackson, S. R. (2004). ERP Correlates of a Receptive Language-Switching Task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57(2), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000198

Kaushanskaya, M., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Marian, V. (2020). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Ten years later. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(5), 945–950. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000038

Koch, I., Gade, M., Schuch, S., & Philipp, A. M. (2010). The role of inhibition in task switching: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.1.1

Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., & Wodniecka, Z. (2006). Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002483

Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category Interference in Translation and Picture Naming: Evidence for Asymmetric Connections Between Bilingual Memory Representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1008

Kroll, J. F., & Sunderman, G. (2003). Cognitive Processes in Second Language Learners and Bilinguals: The Development of Lexical and Conceptual Representations. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 104–129). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch5

Luk, G., & Bialystok, E. (2013). Bilingualism is not a categorical variable: Interaction between language proficiency and usage. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 605–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.795574

Macizo, P., Bajo, T., & Paolieri, D. (2012). Language switching and language competition. Second Language Research, 28(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658311434893

Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing Language Profiles in Bilinguals and Multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 940–967. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067)

McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375

Mosca, M., & de Bot, K. (2017). Bilingual Language Switching: Production vs. Recognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 934. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00934

Navracsics, J., & Sáry, Gy. (2013). Vizuális szófelismerés a kétnyelvűségben [Visual word recognition in bilingualism]. Alkalmazott Nyelvtudomány. Hungarian Journal of Applied Limguistics, 13(1-2), 2013.

Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation (pp. 1–18). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0629-1_1

Orfanidou, E., & Sumner, P. (2005). Language switching and the effects of orthographic specificity and response repetition. Memory & Cognition, 33(2), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195323

Pavlenko, A. (2004). ‘Stop Doing That, Ia Komu Skazala !’: Language Choice and Emotions in Parent—Child Communication. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 25(2–3), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630408666528

Preston, M. S., & Lambert, W. E. (1969). Interlingual interference in a bilingual version of the stroop color-word task. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8(2), 295–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80079-4

Reynolds, M. G., Schlöffel, S., & Peressotti, F. (2016). Asymmetric Switch Costs in Numeral Naming and Number Word Reading: Implications for Models of Bilingual Language Production. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02011

Shallice, T. (1988). From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511526817

Sheng, L., Lu, Y., & Gollan, T. H. (2014). Assessing language dominance in Mandarin–English bilinguals: Convergence and divergence between subjective and objective measures. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(2), 364–383. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000424

Smith, M. C. (1997). How do bilinguals access lexical information? In A. M. B. de Groot & J. F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 145–168). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Stoet, G. (2010). PsyToolkit: A software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 1096–1104. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.4.1096

Stoet, G. (2017). PsyToolkit: A Novel Web-Based Method for Running Online Questionnaires and Reaction-Time Experiments. Teaching of Psychology, 44(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628316677643

Thomas, M. S. C., & Allport, A. (2000). Language Switching Costs in Bilingual Visual Word Recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(1), 44–66. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2700

van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T., & Grainger, J. (1998). Orthographic Neighborhood Effects in Bilingual Word Recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(3), 458–483. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2584

von Studnitz, R. E., & Green, D. W. (1997). Lexical Decision and Language Switching. International Journal of Bilingualism, 1(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/136700699700100102

von Studnitz, R. E., & Green, D. W. (2002). The cost of switching language in a semantic categorization task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728902003036