Syntactic Complexity at the Intermediate Level in EFL Writing by Early Balanced Bilinguals

Abstract

The present article involves an empirical psycholinguistic study aimed at examining syntactic complexity in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) by early balanced Bosnian/Swedish bilingual EFL learners. 15 early balanced bilingual Bosnian/Swedish EFL learners were recruited for the study and matched with their respective control groups of intermediate EFL learners (15 speakers of Bosnian as their first language (L1) and 15 speakers of Swedish as their L1). The experimental task involved an unprepared writing assignment in English about the most significant invention of the 20th century. The corpus of the participants’ written assignments was analysed in L2 Syntactic Complexity Analyzer and SPSS software programs respectively. Data analysis involved measures of syntactical complexity. It has been found that the participants’ written assignments are characterised by statistically significant number of T-units scores in comparison with the Swedish L1 monolingual controls. These findings are further presented and discussed in the article.

References

• Ahmadian, M. J., & Tavakoli, M. (2011). The effects of simultaneous use of careful online
  planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency in EFL learners’ oral
  production. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 35-59.
• Alotaibi, A. M. (2016). Examining the Learnability of English Relative Clauses: Evidence
  from Kuwaiti EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 9(2), 57.
• Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bofman, T. (1989). Attainment of syntactic and morphological
  accuracy by advanced language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(01),
  17-34.
  
• Byrnes, H. (2009). Emergent L2 German writing ability in a curricular context: A
  longitudinal study of grammatical metaphor. Linguistics and Education, 20(1), 50–66.
• Ben-Zeev, S. (1977). The influence of bilingualism on cognitive strategy and cognitive
  development. Child Development, 48(3), 1009–1018.
  
• Bialystok, E. (1988). Levels of bilingualism and levels of linguistic awareness.
  Developmental Psychology, 24, 560–567.
  
• Bialystok, E., Majumder, S., & Martin, M.M. (2003). Developing phonological awareness:
  Is there a bilingual advantage? Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 27–44.
  
• Cenoz, J. (1998). Beyond bilingualism: multilingualism and multilingual education.
  Clevedon, England Multilingual Matters
  
• Cenoz, J. & Valencia, J. (1992). The role of bilingualism in foreign language acquisition:
  Learning English in the Basque country. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural
  Development
  
• Cummins, J. (2000). Language, Power, and Pedagogy: Bilingual Children in the
  Crossfire. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters
  
• Daiute, C.A. (1981). Psycholinguistic Foundations of the Writing Process. Research in the
  Teaching of English, 15, 1, 5–22
  
• Dekydtspotter, L., & Renaud, C. (2014). On second language processing and grammatical
  development: The parser in second language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to
  Bilingualism, 4(2), 131–165.
  
• Gaies, S. J. (1979). Linguistic input in formal second language learning: The issues of
  syntactic gradation and readability in ESL materials. TESOL quarterly, 41–50.
  
• Gaies, S. J. (1980). T-unit analysis in second language research: Applications, problems
  and limitations. TESOL quarterly, 53–60.
  
• Grodner, D., Gibson, E., & Tunstall, S. (2002). Syntactic complexity in ambiguity
  resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(2), 267–295.
  
• Grosjean, F. (2008). Studying Bilinguals. Journal of linguistics, 45, 3, 715–719.
  
• Herdina, P, & Jessner U. (2000). The dynamics of third language acquisition. In J. Cenoz
  and U. Jessner (eds) English in Europe: The Acquisition of a Third Language, (pp. 84–98).
  Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  
• Ho-Peng, L. (1983). Using T-unit measures to assess writing proficiency of university ESL
  students. RELC Journal, 14(2), 35–43.
  
• Hunt, K. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. NCTE Research
  report, 3. Champaign, IL.
  
• Hunt, K. W. (1970). Syntactic maturity in schoolchildren and adults. Monographs of the
  society for research in child development, 35(1), iii–67.
  
• Inoue, C. (2016). A comparative study of the variables used to measure syntactic
  complexity and accuracy in task-based research. The Language Learning Journal, 1–19.
  
• Iwashita, N. (2006). Syntactic complexity measures and their relation to oral proficiency in
  Japanese as a foreign language. Language Assessment Quarterly: An International
  Journal, 3(2), 151–169.
  
• Kapranov, O. (2015). Self-Evaluation of Speech Fluency in English as a Second Language
  by Korean Exchange Students Studying in Sweden. In L. Szymanski & M. Kuczynski
  (eds.) Language, Thought and Education: Exploring Networks. (pp. 61–77). Zielona Gora:
  Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielenogorskiego.
  
• Kapranov, O. (2013). Beginner Students’ Speech Fluency in a Second Language
  Compared across Two Contexts of Acquisition. In E. Piechurska-Kuciel & E. SzymanskaCzaplak (eds.) Language in Cognition and Affect (pp.81-95). Berlin: Springer.
  
• Kobayashi, H., & Rinnert, C. (1992). Effects of First Language on Second Language
  Writing: Translation versus Direct Composition. Language Learning, 42(2), 183–209.
  
• Lambert, W.E. (1974). Culture and language as factors in learning and education. Cultural
  factors in learning and education. Bellingham, WA: Fifth Western Washington
  Symposium on Learning.
• Lu, X. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing,
  International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 474–496.
  
• Macnamara, B. N., & Conway, A. R. (2014). Novel evidence in support of the bilingual
  advantage: Influences of task demands and experience on cognitive control and working
  memory. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 21(2), 520–525.
  
• Molnár, T. (2011). Second language versus third language acquisition: A comparison of
  the English lexical competence of monolingual and bilingual students. Toronto Working
  Papers in Linguistics, 33(1).
  
• Navés, T., Torras, M. R., & Celaya, M. L. (2003). Long-term effects of an earlier start: An
  analysis of EFL written production. Eurosla yearbook, 3(1), 103–129.
  
• Norbert, F. (2012). Bilingual competence and bilingual proficiency in child development.
  Massachusetts: MIT Press.
• Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency:
  A research synthesis of college‐level L2 writing. Applied linguistics, 24(4), 492–518.
  
• Shaw, P., & Liu, E. T. K. (1998). What develops in the development of second-language
  writing?. Applied linguistics, 19(2), 225–254.
  
• Slavoff, G.R. & Johnson, J. S. (1995). The effects of age and the rate of learning a second
  anguage. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17 (1), 1–16.
  
• Sotillo, S. M. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and
  asynchronous communication. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 82–119.
  
• Weissberg, B. (2000). Developmental relationships in the acquisition of English syntax:
  writing vs. speech. Learning and Instruction 10, 37–53.
  
• Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S, & Kim, H-Y. (1998). Second Language Development in
  Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy and Complexity Honolulu: University of Hawai'i,
  Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
  
• Wolff, D. (2000). Second language writing: a few remarks on psycholinguistic and
  instructional issues. Bergische Universita¨t Gesamthochschule Wuppertal: Wuppertal,
  Germany.
  
• Xiaofei, L. (2010). L2 Syntactical Complexity Analyzer. Software program.
  
• Yau, M. S., & Belanger, J. (1984). The Influence Mode on the Syntactic Complexity of
  EFL Students at Three Grade Levels. TESL Canada Journal, 2(1), 65–77.
  
• Youn, S. J. (2014). Measuring syntactic complexity in L2 pragmatic production:
  Investigating relationships among pragmatics, grammar, and proficiency. System, 42, 270–
  287.
•