Gender Differences in Semantic Fluency Patterns in Children

Abstract

Previous literature in cognitive psychology has provided data involving differences in language processing between men and women. It has been found that women are usually more proficient with certain semantic categories such as fruit, vegetables and furniture.  Men are reported to be better at other categories semantic, e.g.  tools and transport. The aim of this article is to provide an inquiry about possible differences in semantic category processing of living things (LT) and inanimate objects (IO) by Argentinian Spanish-speakers school-aged children. The group of 86 children between 8 and 12 years old (51.16% boys) has been assessed on a semantic fluency task. Six semantic categories have been tested, three of them from the LT domain (animals, fruit/vegetables, and body parts) and three from the IO domain (transport, clothes and musical instruments). Results showed differences in semantic processing between boys and girls. Girls retrieved more items from the LT domain and activated more animals and fruit/vegetables.  These findings appear to support an innate conceptual organization of the mind, which is presumably influenced by cultural factors and/or schooling.

References

• Albanese, E., Capitani, E., Barbarotto, R., & Laiacona, M. (2000). Semantic category
  dissociations, familiarity and gender. Cortex, 36, 733–746.
• Barbarotto, R., Laiacona, M., & Capitani, E. (2008). Does sex influence the age of acquisition
  of common names? A contrast of different semantic categories. Cortex, 44(9), 1161–1170. doi:
  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.016
• Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., & Barbarotto, R. (1999). Gender affects Word retrieval of certain
  categories in semantic fluency tasks. Cortex, 35, 273–278. doi:
  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70800-1
• Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2003). What are the facts of
  semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence. Cognitive
  Neuropsychology, 20, 213–261. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02643290244000266
• Caramazza, A., & Mahon, B. Z. (2003). The organization of conceptual knowledge: The
  evidence from category-specific semantic deficits. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 354–361.
• Caramazza, A., & Mahon, B. Z. (2006). The organisation of conceptual knowledge in the
  brain: the future’s past and some future directions. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 13–38
• Caramazza, A., & Shelton, J. R. (1998). Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: The
  animate-inanimate distinction Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 1–34. doi:
  http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/089892998563752
• Casals-Coll, M., Sánchez-Benavides, G., Quintana, M., Manero, R. M., Rognoni, T., Calvo, L.,
  & Peña-Casanova, J. (2013). Estudios normativos españoles en población adulta joven
  (proyecto NEURONORMA jóvenes): normas para los test de fluencia verbal. Neurología,
  28(1), 33–40.
• Fumagalli, J.; Sorinano, F.; Shalom, D.; Barreyro, J.P; Martinez Cuitiño, M.M (In press).
  Phonological and semantic verbal fluency task in a sample of Argentinean children. Temas em
  Psychologia, 25(3).
• Gainotti, G. (2005). The influence of gender and lesion location on naming disorders for
  animals, plants and artefacts. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1633–1644. doi:
  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.01.016
• Gainotti, G., Ciaraffa, F., Silveri, M. C., & Marra, C. (2010). Different views about the nature
  of gender-related asymmetries in task based on biological or artefact categories. Behavioural
  Neurology, 22(3–4), 81–90. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/410858
• Gainotti, G., Spinelli, P., Scaricamazza, E., & Marra, C. (2012). Asymmetries in genderrelated familiarity with different semantic categories. Data from normal adults. Behavioural
  Neurology, 27(2), 175–181. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/138646
• Gerlach, C., & Gainotti, G. (2016). Gender differences in category-specificity do not reflect
  innate dispositions. Cortex 85, 46–53.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.09.022
• Hurks, P., Vles, J., Hendriksen, J., Kalff, A., Feron, F., Kroes, M., . . . Jolles, J. (2006).
  Category Fluency Versus Initial Letter Fluency Over 60 Seconds as a Measure of Automatic and Controlled Processing in Healthy School-aged Children. Journal of Clinical and
  Experimental Neuropsychology, 28, 284–295. doi: 10.1080/13803390590954191
• John, S., & Rajashekhar, B. (2014). Word retrieval ability on fluency task in typically
  developing Malayalam-speaking children. Child Neuropsychology: A Journal on Normal and
  Abnormal Development in Childhood and Adolescence, 20(2), 182–195. doi:
  http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2012.760538
• Koren, R., Kofman, O., & Berger, A. (2005). Analysis of word clustering in verbal fluency of
  school-aged children. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 1087–1104. doi:
  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2005.06.012
• Laiacona, M., Barbarotto, R., & Capitani, E. (2006). Human evolution and the brain
  representation of semantic knowledge: Is there a role for sex differences? Evol. Hum. Behav,
  27, 158-168. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.08.002
• Laws, K. R. (1999). Gender afects latencies for naming living and nonliving things:
  implications for familiarity. Cortex, 35, 729–733.
• Laws, K. R. (2000). Category-specificity naming errors in normal subjects: the influence of
  evolution and experience. Brain and Language, 75, 123–133. doi:
  http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2348
• Laws, K. R. (2004). Sex differences in lexical size across semantic categories. Personality and
  invidual differences, 36, 23–32. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00048-5
• Leite, G., Pires, I., Aragão, L., Lemos, P., Gomes, E., Garcia, D., Barros, P., Alencar, J.,
  Fichman, H. & Oliveira, R. (2016). Performance of Children in Phonemic and Semantic
  Verbal Fluency Tasks. Psico-USF, 21(2), 293–304. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-
  82712016210207
• Lozano Guitiérrez, A., & Ostrosky-Solís, F. (2006). Efecto de la edad y la escolaridad en la
  fluidez verbal semántica: datos normativos en población hispanohablante. Revista Mexicana
  de Psicología, 23(1), 37–44.
• Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2003). Constraining questions about the organization and
  representation of conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 433–450.
• Marino, J., Acosta Mesas, A., & Zorza, J. (2011). Control ejecutivo y fluidez verbal en
  población infantil: medidas cuantitativas,cualitativas y temporales. Interdisciplinaria, 28(2),
  245–260.
• Marino, J., & Díaz-Fajreldines, H. (2011). Pruebas de fluidez verbal categoriales, fonológicas
  y gramaticales en la infancia: factores ejecutivos y semánticos. Revista Chilena de
  Neuropsicología, 6(1), 49–56.
• Marra, C., Ferraccioli, M., & Gainotti, G. (2007). Gender-Related Dissociations of Categorical
  Fluency in Normal Subjects and in Subjects With Alzheimer’s Disease. Neuropsychology,
  21(2), 207–211. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.21.2.207
• Martínez-Cuitiño, M.; Shalóm, D.; Borovinsky, G.; Szenkman, D. & Fumagalli, J. (2014)
  ¿Diferencias en el procesamiento semántico en niños en edad escolar? (77). Memorias del
  VI Congreso Internacional de Investigación y Práctica Profesional en Psicología, XXI
  Jornadas de Investigación, décimo encuentro de investigadores en Psicología del Mercosur.
  Adicciones: Desafíos y perspectivas para la investigación.
• McKenna, P., & Parry, R. (1994). Category-specificity in the naming of natural and man-made
  objects. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 4, 255–281. doi: 10.1080/09602019408401461
• Moreno-Martínez, F. J., & Montoro, P. R. (2008). The impact of dementia , age and sex on
  category fluency: Greater deficits in women with Alzheimer’s disease. Cortex, 44,1256–1264.
• Moreno-Martínez, F. J. & Moratilla-Pérez, I. (2016). Naming and Categorization in Healthy
  Participants: Crowded Domains and Blurred Effects of Gender. The Spanish Journal of
  Psychology 19, 49, 1–15. doi:10.1017/sjp.2016.59
• Nieto, A., Galtier, I., Barroso, J., & Espinosa, G. (2008). Fluencia verbal en niños españoles en
  edad escolar: estudio normativo piloto y análisis de las estrategias organizativas. Revista de
  Neurología, 46(1), 2–6.
• Olabarrieta Landa, L., Benito Sanchez, I., Landa Torre, E., López Mugartza Iriarte, J., Alegret,
  M., Arango-Lasprilla, J. (2015) The Effect of Specific Language on Performance on Verbal
  Fluency Tasks in Basque-Spanish Bilinguals. Arch Clin
  Neuropsychol, 30(6), 565. doi:10.1093/arclin/acv047.208
• Pekkala, S., Goral, M., Hyun, J., Obler, L. K., Erkinjuntti, T., & & Albert, M. (2009).
  Semantic verbal fluency in two contrasting languages. Clin Linguist Phon., 23(6), 431–445.
  doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699200902839800
• Riva, D., Nichelli, F., & Devoti, M. (2000). Developmental Aspects of Verbal Fluency
  Confrontation Naming in Children. Brain and Language, 71, 267–284. doi:
  http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2166
• Soriano, F., Fumagalli, J., Shalóm, D., Carden, J., Borovinsky, G., Manes, F., & MartínezCuitiño, M. (2015). Sex differences in a semantic fluency task. East European Journal of
  Psycholinguistics, 2(1), 134–140.
• Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. A. (1998). Compendium of neuropsychological tests (2nd ed.). New
  York, NY: Oxford Univesity Press.
• Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.),
  Organization Memory. New York: Academic Press.
•