Temporal measurements for Second Language speaking fluency

Essa Qurbi

doi:10.29038/

Authors

Essa Qurbi Najran University, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/

Keywords:

second language (L2) fluency, temporal measurements, speech rate , pausing patterns , mean length of utterance , L2 speaking assessment

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between temporal measurements and second language (L2) speaking fluency, focusing on speech rate (SR), mean length of utterance (MLU), and pausing patterns (PP). The study recruited 60 advanced English L2 adult learners (male and female) who were presented with a picture book where each page included only one picture representing a specific sequence of the story's development. The participants’ main task was to orally describe the story where their oral descriptions were electronically recorded using PsychoPy software. The primary goal was to determine which of the above-mentioned temporal measurements significantly influence L2 speaking assessment. These participants’ spoken samples were evaluated by five English language instructors using standardized L2 speaking assessment rubric. A statistical analysis was conducted to examine the effect of these three temporal measurements on L2 speaking assessment. The results showed that SR (average words per minute) and PP (average pause duration per minute), but not mean length of utterance (MLU), were significant factors of L2 speaking fluency assessment. However, the interaction between these factors was not significant. That is, SR and PP factors provide a listener with a positive impression about L2 speakers’ speaking performance. These results are consistent with other studies that examined L2 speaking fluency. The findings also underline the importance of listeners’ impression when it comes to L2 speaking assessment. In addition, the study highlights the effect of temporal measurements on L2 speaking assessments and provides insights for both evaluators and learners on the factors affecting L2 fluency assessment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chambers, F. (1997). What do we mean by fluency? ELT Journal, 51(1), 22–32.

De Jong, N. H., Steinel, M. P., Florijn, A. F., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2013). Linguistic skills and speaking fluency in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(5), 893–916. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000522

Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I. (2004). Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54(4), 655–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00277.x

Fillmore, C. J. (1979). On fluency. In D. Kempler & W. S.-Y. Wang (Eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior (pp. 85–102). Academic Press.

Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100015065

Freed, B. F., Segalowitz, N., & Dewey, D. P. (2004). Context of learning and second language fluency in French: Comparing regular classroom, study abroad, and intensive domestic immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 275–301. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104262061

Freed, B. (2000). Is fluency, like beauty, in the eyes (and ears) of the beholder? In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 243–265). University of Michigan Press.

Iwashita, N., Brown, A., McNamara, T., & O'Hagan, S. (2008). Assessed levels of second language speaking proficiency: How distinct? Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 24–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm026

Kormos, J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kormos, J., & Dénes, M. (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32(2), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001

Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press.

Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40(3), 387–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00207.x

Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1998). The effects of speaking rate on listener evaluations of native and foreign-accented speech. Language Learning, 48(2), 159–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00043

Nation, I. S. P. (2014). Developing fluency. In T. Muller, J. Adamson, P. S. Brown, & S. Herder (Eds.), Exploring EFL fluency in Asia (pp. 11–25). Palgrave Macmillan.

New York State LOTE assessments (n.d. ). Sample Assessment Rubric. Retrieved March 2, 2024, from https://www.nysed.gov/sites/default/files/programs/world-languages/lotecassess.pdf

Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. Routledge.

Rehbein, J. (1987). On fluency in second language speech. In H. W. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.), Psycholinguistic models of production (pp. 97–105). Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Riggenbach, H. (1991). Toward an understanding of fluency: A microanalysis of nonnative speaker conversations. Discourse Processes, 14(4), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539109544857

Rossiter, M. J. (2009). Perceptions of L2 fluency by native and non-native speakers of English. Canadian Modern Language Review, 65(3), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.65.3.395

Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. Routledge.

Segalowitz, N., & Freed, B. F. (2004). Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: Learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 173–199. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310426205X

Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00091

Suzuki, S., Kormos, J., & Uchihara, T. (2021). The relationship between utterance and perceived fluency: A meta‐analysis of correlational studies. The Modern Language Journal, 105(2), 435-463.

Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., … Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10587–10592. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903616106

Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005). Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–277). John Benjamins.

Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 84–119. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.1.84