Exploring Concepts of the English-Language Tourism Advertising Discourse in Pre-Pandemic and Pandemic Times
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2022.9.1.kolKeywords:
COVID-19, tourism advertising discourse, conceptual system, cognitive map, domain, autochthon, conceptAbstract
After the Second World War, 2019 definitely became one of the most significant strength tests for humanity that gave a boost to gradual but crucial changes in every person’s mental worldview models, which are particular deeply established constructs of reality. There is no sphere of activity that has not been affected by the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19). Tourism became one of those areas most severely affected by the crisis, caused by pandemic conditions and quarantine measures. Consequently, they had to adjust to the new reality of life in circumstances of numerous human rights and freedom restrictions. This fact stipulates the topicality of the given comparative research. Based on the anthropocentric approach, the authors suggest the research methodology that lies in a complex approach to the discourse analysis as a platform for interrelations between the cognitive worldviews of addresser and addressee. Having identified the concepts-autochthons of the modern English-language tourism advertising discourse and determined their regular correlations, the cognitive map of the modern English-language tourism advertising discourse was designed. Having applied the comparative analysis of the cognitive maps of the traditional and modern English-language tourism advertising discourse, the authors determined the main suppositions of the English-speaking consumer of tourism services during pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. Thus, the traditional view of the English-speaking consumer of tourism services is the perception of tourism as the phenomenon related to unhindered, comfortable traveling and family holidays with gastronomic delight, new acquaintances and positive emotions. However, during the pandemic period, for English-speaking tourism services, consumer tourism became necessary for a change of surroundings, like a sip of fresh air that is available only by following quarantine rules and only in those countries open for tourists. Safety and sanitizing become the most critical factors in choosing a tourist location.Downloads
References
Василенко О., Сенча І. Матемачно-статистичні методи аналізу у прикладних дослідженнях. Одеса: ОНАЗ ім. О. С. Попова, 2011.
Гафу Т., Осовська І. Ментальний ресурс сучасного англомовного гастрономічного рекламного дискурсу. Науковий вісник Чернівецького національного університету імені Юрія Федьковича. Германська філологія. 2021. Вип. 831–832. С. 18–34.
Данілов В. Статистична обробка даних. Київ, 2019.
Колісниченко Т., Коропатніцька Т. Концептосистема сучасного англомовного туристичного рекламного дискурсу. Науковий вісник Чернівецького національного університету імені Юрія Федьковича. Германська філологія. 2021. Вип. 831–832. С. 114–123. https://doi.org/10.31861/gph2021.831-832.114-123
Колісниченко Т. Рекламний туристичний дискурс: характеристики. SLAVIA. Journal for Slavonic Philology, 2019а. Вип. 88, №2. С. 202–210. URL: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=805295
Колісниченко Т. Контент-категорії рекламного туристичного дискурсу. Наукові записки Міжнародного гуманітарного університету. 2019а. Вип. 31. С. 56–59. URL: http://www.sci-notes.mgu.od.ua/archive/v31/15.pdf
Осовська І. Сучасний німецькомовний сімейний дискурс: ментальний і вербальний ресурс. Чернівці: РОДОВІД, 2014.
Приходько А. Концепты и концептосистемы. Днепропетровск: Белая Е.А, 2013.
Прохоров Ю. К проблеме «концепта» и «концептосферы». Язык, сознание, коммуникация, 2005. Вып. 30. С. 74–94.
Серегина М. Туристический дискурс: лингвосемиотические особенности функционирования паремий. Филология: научные исследования. 2021. Вып. 3. С. 59–66. URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=33475
Томнюк, Л. Сучасний німецькомовний тюремний дискурс (когнітивно-семантичний аспект). Дис. канд. філол. наук. 10.02.04 германські мови. Чернівці: Чернівецький національний університет імені Юрія Федьковича, 2018а. URL: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XVw5luXizMaK-CaamfnaZoulMsWYaYUd/view
Томнюк, Л. Дискурс як соціокультурний вимір мови. In Таврійські філологічні наукові читання: матеріали Міжнародної науково-практичної конференції. Київ: Таврійський національний університет імені В. І. Вернадського, 2018b. С. 122-125.
IBM SPSS Statistics. (n.d.). Retrieved August 21, 2021, from https://www.ibm.com/analytics/spss-statistics-software
Ignatova, E. (2020). Where have all the people gone: a multimodal critical discourse study of the representation of people in promotional tourism discourse. Tourism, Culture & Communication, 20, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3727/109830420X15894802540205
Jalilifar, A., & Moradi, Y. (2019). Tourism discourse revisited: an analysis of evaluative strategies in tourist brochures from a systemic functional linguistics perspective. Journal of English Studies, 17, 211–232. https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.3595
Kostruba, N. (2021). Social Restrictions in the COVID-19 Pandemic As a Traumatic Experience: Psycholinguistic Markers. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2021.8.1.kos
Osovska, I., & Tomniuk, L. (2019). Modern German Prison Discourse: Mental Resource. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 16(2), 61–87. Retrieved from http://www.skase.sk/Volumes/JTL40/pdf_doc/04.pdf
Vakhidova, F.S. (2021). Tourism discourse and its terminology. JournalNX – A Multidisciplinary Peer Reviewed Journal, 7(3), 150–152.
Yakhshieva, Z., Ortiqova, E., Babadjanova, G., & Khasanova, K. (2021). The Versatility Of Genres Of Tourism Discourse. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(2), 5698–5700. https://doi.org/10.17762/pae.v58i2.2994
References (translated and transliterated)
IBM SPSS Statistics. (n.d.). Retrieved August 21, 2021, from https://www.ibm.com/analytics/spss-statistics-software
Ignatova, E. (2020). Where have all the people gone: a multimodal critical discourse study of the representation of people in promotional tourism discourse. Tourism, Culture & Communication, 20, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3727/109830420X15894802540205
Jalilifar, A., & Moradi, Y. (2019). Tourism discourse revisited: an analysis of evaluative strategies in tourist brochures from a systemic functional linguistics perspective. Journal of English Studies, 17, 211–232. https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.3595
Kostruba, N. (2021). Social Restrictions in the COVID-19 Pandemic As a Traumatic Experience: Psycholinguistic Markers. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2021.8.1.kos
Osovska, I., & Tomniuk, L. (2019). Modern German Prison Discourse: Mental Resource. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 16(2), 61–87. Retrieved from http://www.skase.sk/Volumes/JTL40/pdf_doc/04.pdf
Vakhidova, F.S. (2021). Tourism discourse and its terminology. JournalNX – A Multidisciplinary Peer Reviewed Journal, 7(3), 150–152.
Yakhshieva, Z., Ortiqova, E., Babadjanova, G., & Khasanova, K. (2021). The versatility of genres of tourism discourse. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(2), 5698–5700. https://doi.org/10.17762/pae.v58i2.2994
Vasylenko, O., & Sencha, I. (2011). Matemachno-statystychni metody analizu u prykladnykh doslidzhenniakh [Mathematical and statistical methods of analysis in applied research]. Odesa: ONAZ im. O. S. Popova.
Hafu, T., & Osovska, I. (2021). Mentalnyi resurs suchasnoho anhlomovnoho hastronomichnoho reklamnoho dyskursu [Mental resource of the modern English gastronomic advertising discourse]. Naukovyi Visnyk of Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University. German Philology, 831–832, 18–34.
Danilov, V. (2019). Statystychna obrobka danykh [Statistical data processing]. Kyiv.
Kolisnychenko, T., & Koropatnitska, T. (2021). Kontseptosystema suchasnoho anhlomovnoho turystychnoho reklamnoho dyskursu [Conceptual system of the modern English-language tourist advertising discourse]. Naukovyi Visnyk of Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University. German Philology, 831–832, 114–123. https://doi.org/10.31861/gph2021.831-832.114-123
Kolisnychenko, T. (2019a). Reklamnyi turystychnyi dyskurs: kharakterystyky [Advertising tourist discourse: characteristics]. SLAVIA. Journal for Slavonic Philology, 88(2), 202–210. Retrieved from https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=805295
Kolisnychenko, T. (2019b). Kontent-katehorii reklamnoho turystychnoho dyskursu [Content categories of advertising tourist discourse]. Naukovi Zapysky of International Humanitarian University, 31, 56–59. Retrieved from http://www.sci-notes.mgu.od.ua/archive/v31/15.pdf
Osovska, I. (2014). Suchasnyi nimetskomovnyi simeinyi dyskurs: mentalnyi i verbalnyi resurs [Modern German-speaking family discourse: mental and verbal resources]. Chernivtsi: Rodovid.
Prikhodko. A. (2013). Kontsepty i Kontseptosistemy [Concepts and Concept Systems]. Dnepropetrovsk: Belaya E.A.
Prokhorov. Yu. (2005). K probleme “kontsepta” i “kontseptosfery” [To the problem of “concept” and “concept sphere”]. Yazyk. Soznaniye. Kommunikatsiya, 30, 74–94.
Seregina. M. (2021). Turisticheskiy diskurs: lingvosemioticheskiye osobennosti funktsionirovaniya paremiy [Tourist discourse: linguistic semiotic features of the paremias functioning]. Filologiya: Nauchnyye Issledovaniya, 3, 59–66. Retrieved from https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=33475
Tomniuk, L. (2018а). Suchasnyj nimets'komovnyj tyuremnyj dyskurs (kohnityvnosemantychnyj aspekt) [Modern German prison discourse (cognitive-semantic aspect)]. Ph.D. thesis. Chernivtsi: Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XVw5luXizMaK-CaamfnaZoulMsWYaYUd/view
Tomniuk, L. (2018b). Dyskurs yak sotsiokulturnyi vymir movy [Discourse as a sociocultural dimension of language]. Tavriiski Filolohichni Naukovi Chytannia: Book of Abstracts. Kyiv: Vernadskyi Taurida National University. (122–125).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Tetiana Kolisnichenko, Iryna Osovska, Liudmyla Tomniuk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.