Discursive use of modality in RT’s coverage of Russia’s war on Ukraine

Ihor Matseliukh

doi:10.29038/

Authors

Ihor Matseliukh Ukrainian Catholic University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/

Keywords:

modality, critical discourse analysis (CDA), discursive strategy, bias, RT, ideology, propaganda

Abstract

The current article looks into various types of modality use through the prism of critical discourse analysis (CDA) strategies in the coverage of Russia’s war against Ukraine by the international news provider RT. It aims to uncover how discursive practices, in the name of the Russian state ideology, govern the choice of modality means and explain their dependence on and relevance to the news stories, actors, circumstances within the broader field of representation. The corpus for this article was compiled on RT’s website within one week from July 17th to 24th, 2024, almost two and a half years into Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. It consists of 93 news stories of Ukraine related content comprising 41,418 words and containing different types of modality, occasionally with references to alternative sources, in order to assess and uncover the biased ideological practices on the RT channel. Epistemic modality with its divisional kinds along with the modality of negativity is uncovered; as well as deontic modality, which reflects the ideology of RT‘s propagandistic narratives centered around Western states positioned against Russia’s friendly nations. Conflicting tendencies of factive and emotional reporting are discerned. Quantitative results have been arrived at resorting to both the percentage format and a Mann-Whitney U test, taking into account a similar corpus on the Venezuela crisis of 2019-20. Modality implementation and distribution provides insight into the RT’s propaganda techniques. The article redirects CDA towards news consumption, raising awareness of the readership and enhancing news literacy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aleem, Z. (2017, Nov 10). RT, Russia’s English- Language Propaganda outlet, Will Register as a Foreign Agent. Vox Media. https://www.vox.com/world/2017/11/10/16633586/rt-russia-propaganda-foreign-agent (accessed Aug., 2024)

Badran, D. (2002). Ideology through Modality in Discourse Analysis. [Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, the University of Nottingham]

Buckledee, S. (2018). The Language of Brexit: How Britain Talked Its Way Out of the European Union. Bloomsbury Academic.

Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse Theory and practice. Routledge.

Donna L. (2008). Modality, Persuasion and Manipulation. In Canadian Conservative Discourse Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines ISSN: 1752-3079 Vol 2 (1): 1–16. http://cadaad.org/ejournal (accessed Aug., 2024)

Erlanger, S. (2017, March 8). Russia’s RT Network: Is It More BBC or K.G.B.? The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/08/world/europe/russias-rt-network-is-it-more-bbc-or-kgb.html (accessed Aug., 2024)

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press, Blackwell Publishers.

Fairclough, N. (1995a). Media discourse. Arnold.

Fairclough, N. (1995b). Critical Discourse Analysis The Critical Study of Language. (2nd ed.) Routledge. 2013. P. 223 –

Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and Power. Routledge. (2nd ed.) Pearson Education Limited (original work published 1989)

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse. Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.

Firth, J. R. (1957). Studies in Linguistic Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell.

Fowler, R. (1985). Power. In T. A. van Dijk (ed.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. 4. London: Academic Press, Inc. pp.61-82.

Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the News. Discourse and Ideology in the Press. Routledge.

Fowler, R., Hodge, R., Kress, G., Trew, T. (2019). Language and control. Routledge.

Gaufman, E. (2017). Security Threats and Public Perception: Digital Russia and the Ukraine Crisis," Palgrave Macmillan.

Gray, R. (2014, March 14). How the Truth is Made at RT. BuzzFeed News. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/rosiegray/how-the-truth-is-made-at-russia-today (accessed Aug., 2024)

Greenfield, M. (2022, May 15). Federal budget subsidies received by RT. Global data and business intelligence platform. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1288564/rt-rossiya-segodnya-budget/ (accessed Aug., 2024)

Halliday, M., A., K. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. (3rd ed.). (Ch. M. I. M.Matthiessen, Ed.) Hodder Arnold.

Hodge, R. and Kress, G. (1988). Social Semiotics. Polity Press.

Jeffries, L. (2010). Critical Stylistics. The Power of English. Palgrave MacMillan.

Jørgensen, M. & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. Sage Publication.

Kling, J., Toepfl, F., Thurman, N., & Fletcher, R. (2022, Dec. 22). Mapping the website and mobile app audiences of Russia’s foreign communication outlets, RT and Sputnik, across 21 countries. Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-110

Lucas, E. & Pomerantsev, P. (2016). Winning the Information War. Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA) https://www.lse.ac.uk/iga/assets/documents/arena/archives/winning-the-information-war-full-report-pdf.pdf (accessed Aug., 2024)

Mantzarlis, A. & Valeeva, A., (2017, July 27). Is Russia Today a legitimate fact-checker? We did the math. The Poynter Institute. https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2017/is-russia-today-a-legitimate-fact-checker-we-did-the-math/ (accessed Aug., 2024)

Matheson, D. (2005). Media Discourses: Analysing Media Texts. Open University Press.

Michałowska-Kubś, A. & Kubś, J. (2023, May 4). Kremlin spent 1.9 billion USD on propaganda last year, the budget exceeded by a quarter. Disinformation Analysis Center. https://www.debunk.org/kremlin-spent-1-9-billion-usd-on-propaganda-last-year-the-budget-exceeded-by-a-quarter (accessed Aug., 2024)

Ngula, R. S. (2015). Epistemic Modality in Social Science Research Articles Written by Ghanaian Authors: A Corpus-Based Study of Disciplinary and Native vs. Non-Native Variations. [Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, Lancaster University, UK].

Orttung, R., Nelson, E., & Livshen, A. (2016, Jan 19). Measuring RT’s Impact on YouTube. For Center for Security Studies (CSS). Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich https://css.ethz.ch/en/services/digital-library/articles/article.html/195584

Palmer, F. (2001). Mood and Modality (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sebeok, Th. A. (ed). (1986). Encyclopedic Dictionary of Semiotics. Mouton de Gruyter Publisher.

Sulkunen, P. and Törrönen, J. (1997). The production of values: The concept of modality in textual discourse analysis. In Semiotica 113(1/2): 43-69.

Talbot, M. (2007). Media Discourse Representation and Interaction. Edinburgh University Press.

van Dijk, Teun (1988). News as Discourse. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

von Wright, G.H. (1951). An Essay in Modal Logic. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co. https://dokumen.pub/qdownload/an-essay-in-modal-logic.html (accessed Aug., 2024)

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2001). Methods of Discourse Studies. Sage Publications.