From conflict of discourses to military conflict: multimodality of identity construction in Russo-Ukrainian war discourse

Authors

  • Valentyna Ushchyna Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2022.9.2.ush

Keywords:

discourse, identity, multimodality, stance, stancetaking, semiosis

Abstract

This study is an attempt to grasp the discursive nature of Russo-Ukrainian war. The critical discourse analysis of the conflicting ways  Russian and Ukrainian identities are constructed in discourse and by discourse can shed light onto the covert reasons of the unprovoked military aggression Russia has been executing against Ukraine. Our assumptions are based on the idea that identity is a manifold of stances taken by individual as well as collective speakers in various situations of communication. Having epistemic and affective dimensions, stances are inherently interactive, and, thus, have a collective or social nature. Generally speaking, conflictual stances, built in war discourse, express national, political, or sociological worldviews of the stance-takers, reflecting their ideologies, values, and beliefs. The way people see the conflict differs according to what "frames" they choose to see it through. In this study, the frames circumscribing Ukrainian and Russian conflictual identities, as they are built in Ukrainian and Russian media discourse, including social media, have been deconstructed and analyzed. As there are diverse semiotic systems that are used to create, transmit and understand meanings (e.g., verbal and non-verbal, written and oral, visual and audial) various modalities employed in the process of discursive construction of these identities were taken into consideration.

Author Biography

Valentyna Ushchyna, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, Ukraine

References

Bucholtz, M. & Hall, K. (2004). Language and identity. In A. Duranti (Ed.). A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology (pp. 369-394). Malden: Blackwell.

De Saussure, F. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale, eds. Charles Bally & Alert Sechehaye, with the assistance of Albert Riedlinger. Lausanne – Paris: Payot. [1st trans.: Wade Baskin, trans. Course in General Linguistics. New York: The Philosophical Society, 1959; subsequently edited by Perry Meisel & Haun Saussy, NY: Columbia University Press, 2011].

Dijk, T.A. van. (2008a). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Dijk, T.A. van (2008b). Discourse and Power. London: Palgrave.

Du Bois, J. (2007). The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.). Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction (pp. 139-182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Eckert, P. (2004). The meaning of style. In W. F. Chiang, E. Chun, L. Mahalingappa and S. Mehus, (Eds.). Proceedings of the eleventh annual symposium about language and society. Austin, Texas Linguistic Forum 47, Ellegård, Alvar. (41-53).

Englebretson, R. (2007). Stancetaking in discourse: An Introduction. In R. Englebretson (Ed.). Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction (pp. 1-25). Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the Self. Lectures at University of Vermont. In Technologies of the Self, (pp. 16-49). Univ. of Massachusets Press.

Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Jaffe, A. (2009). Introduction: the sociolinguistics of Stance. In A. Jaffe (Ed.). Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspective (pp. 3-28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kiesling, S. F., Pavalanathan, U., Fitzpatrick, J., Han, X. & Eisenstein, J. (2018). Interactional Stancetaking in Online Forums. Computational Linguistics, 44(4), 689-718. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00334

Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold Publishers.

Silverstein, M. (1979). Language structure and linguistic ideology. In R. Cline, W. Hanks, and C. Hofbauer, (Eds.). The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels (pp. 193-247). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

Silverstein, Michael (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. In Language & Communication. Volume 23, Issues 3–4, p. 193-229.

Sources

Putin, V. V. (2021) On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians (in Russian). Retrieved from http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/66181.

Sergeytsev, T. (2022). What Russia should do with Ukraine? (in Russian). RIA Novosti, April, 3, 2022. Retrieved from https://archive.ph/78PuH

Downloads

Published

2022-12-26

How to Cite

Ushchyna, V. (2022). From conflict of discourses to military conflict: multimodality of identity construction in Russo-Ukrainian war discourse. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2022.9.2.ush

Issue

Section

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2022) Special Issue "Language and War"