Cultivation of solidarity and soft power: Ukrainian President Zelensky’s 2022 speech to Japan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2022.9.2.matKeywords:
Zelensky’s speech, politeness theory, face, common ground, solidarity, soft power, speech act of requestAbstract
Words not only describe the world but also influence the world or modify relationships (Austin, 1965; Pinker et al,, 2008). Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has presented his competence in influencing or even shaping diplomatic relationships through his words and utterances. This study explores the ways in which he has been successful as a strategic speaker (Lee & Pinker, 2010), establishing solidarity with Japan using the soft power introduced by Nye (2004, 2011). By closely examining his 12-minute online speech at the Japanese parliament in March 2022, it investigates the extent to which his speech has exerted influence on the Japanese people as well as on the two countries’ relationship. As for methodology, the data of an English-translated script were analyzed by adopting politeness theory (Brown & Levinson, 1987), which stems from the concept of “face” (Goffman, 1967), a positive social value in social interaction. Specifically, all of President Zelensky’s utterances were evaluated by three factors that account for politeness strategies – relative power, social distance, and weight of imposition. Based on this analysis and the responses in Japan, this study argues that his speech adopted not only face-threatening but also face-boosting effects (Bayraktaroğlu, 1991), building common ground as an affiliation strategy and generating solidarity and soft power. This study concludes that President Zelensky’s speech to Japan contributes to consolidating solidarity in Japanese minds and soft power, which have encouraged the Japanese government and its citizens to continue supporting Ukraine financially, psychologically, and diplomatically.
Disclosure Statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Downloads
References
Arquilla, J., & Ronfeldt, D. (1999). The emergence of noopolitik. RAND Corporation.
Austin, J. L. (1965). How to do things with words (the William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955). Oxford University Press.
Bayraktaroğlu, A. (1991). Politeness and interactional imbalance. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 92(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1991.92.5
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (studies in interactional sociolinguistics 4) (Reissue ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Chilton, P. (1990). Politeness, politics and diplomacy. Discourse & Society, 1(2), 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926590001002005
Chitty, N. (2020). Soft power, civic virtue and world politics (overview). In N. Chitty, L. Ji, C. Hayden, & G. D. Rawnsley (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of soft power (pp. 9–36). Taylor & Francis.
Craig, R. T., Tracy, K., & Spisak, F. (1986). The discourse of requests: Assessment of a politeness approach. Human Communication Research, 12(4), 437–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1986.tb00087.x
Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students. Routledge.
Fajar, M. (2019). Power and solidarity reflected in the use of pronouns portrayed in the hybrid political discourse. Journal of English Education, Linguistics and Literature, 5(2), 57. https://doi.org/10.32682/jeell.v5i2.991
Feklyunina, V. (2016). Soft power and identity: Russia, Ukraine and the ‘Russian world(s).’ European Journal of International Relations, 22(4), 773–796. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066115601200
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual (1st ed.). Doubleday & Company.
Holtgraves, T. (1997). Yes, but...: Positive politeness in conversation arguments. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(2), 222–239.
Kristeva, J. (1986). Word, dialogue, and the novel. In T. Moi (Ed.), The Kristeva Reader. (pp. 35–61). Columbia University Press.
Lakoff, R. T. (1990). Talking Power: The Politics of Language (1st ed.). Basic Books.
Lee, J. J, & Pinker, S. (2010). Rationales for indirect speech: The theory of the strategic speaker. Psychological Review, 117(3), 785.
Mattern, J. B. (2005). Why ‘soft power’ isn’t so soft: Representational force and the sociolinguistic construction of attraction in world politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33(3), 583–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050330031601
Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics (Illustrated ed.). PublicAffairs.
Nye, J. S. (2011). The future of power (Illustrated ed.). PublicAffairs.
Pinker, S., Nowak, M. A., & Lee, J. J. (2008). The logic of indirect speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(3), 833–838.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
Stopniece, S. (2018). Finnish–Chinese investment negotiation: Power positioning and search for common ground. Economic and Political Studies, 6(4), 445–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2018.1535760
Tannen, D. (1993). Gender and conversational interaction (Oxford Studies in sociolinguistics) (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
Sources
Bunshun Online Special Report. (2022, March 24). Wabisabi wo Kanjiru Haiku noyōna Inshō, Kōkateki datta Momotarō no Itsuwa, Zelensukī Daitōryō Kokkai Supīchi Mittsuno Shimitowa?, Heiwa Kōchiku no Senmonka ga Kaisetsu [The “wabi-sabi” haiku-like impression” and the “effective ‘Momotarō’ anecdote”. . . President Zelensky’s “three true meanings” of his speech at the Diet: An expert on peacebuilding explains]. Bunshun Online. Retrieved from https://bunshun.jp/articles/-/52964
Jiji Press (2022, March 24). Senji Daitōryō, Nihon no Kyōkan wo Jūshi ‘Kachikan Kyōtsū’ ‘Heiwa eno Doryoku’ – Ukruraina Daitōryō Enzetsu [Wartime president emphasizes Japan’s empathy “common values” and “striving for peace”: Ukraine’s presidential speech]. Retrieved from https://www.jiji.com/jc/article?k=2022032301150&g=pol
The Independent. (2022, April 8). Watch in full: President Zelensky addresses Finnish parliament on Ukraine crisis [Video]. YouTube. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2hXkq9baE4
Kageyama Y. (2022, March 24). Zelensukī Daitōryō no Enzetsu Kakumei Bōyomi, Muhyōjō demo Impakuto Dai [President Zelensky’s revolution in speeches: Impactful even with monotonous reading with no expressions]. Mainichi Shimbun. Retrieved from https://mainichi.jp/articles/20220324/k00/00m/030/242000c
Liberal Democratic Party. (2022, April). Sekaino Heiwa wo Mamoru Kokuren ni, Oshirase
[To the United Nations for World Peace]. https://www.jimin.jp/news/information/203373.html
NHK News (2022, March 29). Ukruraina Zelensukī Daitōryō ga Kokkai de Enzetsu, Seikai no Hanno wa [Ukrainian President Zelensky addresses Parliament, reactions from politicians]. Retrieved from https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20220323/k10013548121000.html
NHK News (2022, July 13). Zelensukī Daitōryō Enzetsu Yoku Tsukawareta Wādo wa? [President Zelensky’s speech: What Words were used most often?]. Retrieved from https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20220325/k10013550991000.html
Nippon.com (2022, March 16). Ukraine approaches Japan with offer of Diet speech by Pres. Retrieved from https://www.nippon.com/en/news/yjj2022031600906/
Speech by President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Parliament of Japan. (2022, March). President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy Official Website. Retrieved from https://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/promova-prezidenta-ukrayini-volodimira-zelenskogo-v-parlamen-73769.
Ushio A. (2022, April 14). Zelensukī Daitōryō Enzetsu, Nihon ni Awasete Mairudo ni? Shikisha ga Kaisetsu [President Zelensky’s speech, mildly tailored to Japan? An expert explains]. Asahi Shimbun Digital. Retrieved from https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASQ3R6KKXQ3RULEI009.html
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Misato Matsuoka, Rieko Matsuoka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0