Reframing English Studies in India: Socio-Psycholinguistic Issues


  • Susheel Kumar Sharma University of Allahabad, India



curriculum, decolonisation, education, English literature/ language, Gandhi, India, Macaulay, publications, research, teaching methods.


The paper deals with the theory and praxis of decolonising English Studies in India. The paper suggests appropriate measures to pull out English studies from the Macaulayan paradigm and to recast the priorities in English Studies in the light of changing role for emerging India in the unipolar world realities, rising aspirations of the middle classes, democratic and egalitarian needs. The project of ‘decolonising’ education at the macro-level and English Studies at the micro-level has been discussed with reference to curriculum, teaching methods, materials, evaluation, research and publication and medium of instruction in all possible details in the paper. The paper attempts to deal with contemporary realities like various treaties and market economy and issues like making a distinction between real knowledge and colonial knowledge along with historical context of English Studies. Several measures have been suggested to make English Studies in India relevant to the contemporary times, to save them from being derivative and to reshape Euro-American knowledge about English culture, Literature and Language from Indian perspective. Practical suggestions to decolonise curriculum have been made keeping in view the distinction between teaching literature and language in the first and the second language situations.


Ahmed, A. (1997). Jinnah, Pakistan and Islamic Identity: The Search for Saladin. London and New York: Routledge.

Aidan, R. (2002). Foreword. In D. Frawley (auth.). Hinduism and the Clash of Civilizations, (pp. vii-x). New Delhi: Voice of India.

Arora, S. K. (2016). Cultural and Philosophical Reflections in Indian Poetry in English, 1. New Delhi: Authors Press.

Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (Ed.). (2003). The Post-Colonial Studies Reader. London: Routledge.

B. A. (1883). Indo-Anglian Literature. Calcutta: Thacker, Spink and Co.

Bachchan, H. R. (1965). W. B. Yeats and Occultism: A Study of His Works in Relation to Indian Lore, the Cabbala, Swedenborg, Boehme and Theosophy. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

Bachchan, H. R. (1974). W. B. Yeats and Occultism. New York: Samuel Weiser Inc.

Bachchan, H. R. (1978). Basere se Door [Far from Home]. New Delhi: Rajpal.

Banu, A. (2010). Modern Indian English Poetry. In M. Ramanan et al., (Eds.). Contemporary Indian Poetry in English. New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi.

Binagwaho, A., Ngarambe, B. & Mathewos, K. (2022). Eliminating the White Supremacy Mindset from Global Health Education. Annals of Global Health, 88(1), 1-9. Retrieved from

Chatterjee, B. (1971). John Keats: His Mind and Work. Bombay: Orient Longman.

Chatterjee, K. R. (1974). Studies in Tennyson as Poet of Science. New Delhi: S. Chand.

Chinweizu. (1988). Colonizer’s Logic. In Chinweizu, (Ed.). Voices from Twentieth Century Africa: Griots and Town Criers, (p. 32). London: Faber and Faber.

Consortium for Academic Research and Ethics: CARE. (2019). New Delhi: University Grants Commission.

Cousins, J. H. (n. d.).The Renaissance in India. Madras: Ganesh & Co. Retrieved from

Dharampal. (2000). Civil Disobedience in Indian Tradition, Collected Writings, 2. Mapusa: Other India Press.

Dinkar, R. S. “समर शेष है”. [The War Is On] Retrieved fromसमर_शेष_है_-रामधारी_सिंह_ दिनकर

Dutt, R. C. (1902). Economic History of India. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co.

Fanon, F. (2004). The Wretched of The Earth, Translated from the French by R. Philcox. New York: Grove Press.

Gandhi, M. K. (1938). Hind Swaraj or Indian Home Rule. Ahmedabad: Navajivan. Retrieved from

Gandhi, M. K. (1938). My Own Experience. In Harijan, 9-7, 38. Retrieved from

Gautier, F. (2004). “Cry O my beloved India!” Retrieved from

Griffin, G. (Ed.). (2005). Research Methods for English Studies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd, Second Edition.

Gurung, S. K. (2018). Urban Naxals: How the term came about. The Economic Times. English Edition. Retrieved from|

Higley, J. (2010). Elite Theory and Elites. In Kevin T. Leicht & J. Craig Jenkins (Eds.). Handbook of Politics: State and Society in Global Perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Indian National Party [The]. (1915). British Rule in India Condemned by the British Themselves. London: The Indian National Party.

Katju, Justice Markandey (Ed.). (2013). K. L. Sarkar’s Mimansa Rules of Interpretation: Tagore Law Lectures-1905. New Delhi: Thomson Reuters. 4th edition.

Klose, F. (2014). Decolonization and Revolution. European History Online. Retrieved from

Kubayanda, J. B. (1989). On discourse of decolonization in Africa and the Caribbean. Dispositio, 14(36/38), 25-37. Retrieved from

Kumar, S. (2018). Reflections on Deen Dayal Upadhyaya’s Vision of Chiti and Dharma-Centric Indian Culture. Madhya Bharati: Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 75, 292-313.

Laurie, Colonel W. F. B. (1888). Sketches of Some Distinguished Anglo-Indians: (Second Series) Including Lord Macaulay’s Great Minute on Education in India; With Anglo-Indian Anecdotes and Incidents. London: W. H. Allen. Retrieved from

Macaulay, T. B. (1835). Minute by the Hon’ble T. B. Macaulay, dated the 2nd February 1835 Retrieved from

Macaulay, T B. (1861). Minutes on Education. In G M Young (ed). Macaulay Prose and Poetry. London: Rupert Hart Davis. Retrieved from

Madiou, M. S. E. (2021). The Death of Postcolonialism: The Founder’s Foreword. Janus Unbound: Journal of Critical Studies,1(1), 1-12. Retrieved from

Malhotra, R., & Satyanarayana, D. B. (2020). Sanskrit Non-Translatables: The Importance of Sanskritizing English. Noida: Amaryllis & Harper Collins India.

Malhotra, R. (2013). Being Different: An Indian Challenge to Western Universalism. Noida: Harper Collins.

Mignolo, W. D. (2011). The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options. Durham: Duke UP.

Müller, M. (2002). India: What Can it Teach Us? A Course of Lectures Delivered before the University of Cambridge. New York: Funk & Wagnalls, Publishers.

Naoroji, D. (1901). Poverty and Un-British Rule in India. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co. Retrieved from

Paranjape, M. R. (2022). The End of Post-Colonialism. Retrieved from

Prabha, M. (2000). The Waffle of the Toffs: A Sociocultural Critique of Indian Writing in English. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH.

Rajan, B. (1965). W. B. Yeats: A Critical Introduction. London: Hutchinson.

Rajan, B. (1976). The Overwhelming Question: A Study of the Poetry of T.S. Eliot. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Rajan, B. (ed). (1947). T. S. Eliot: A Study of His Writings by Several Hands. London: Dennis Dobson.

Rajnath, R. N. (1980). T.S. Eliot’s Theory of Poetry, Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.

Rocher, L. (1968 -1969). Lawyers in Classical Hindu Law. Law & Society Review, 3(2/3), 383-402. Retrieved from

Rocher, L. (2012). Studies in Hindu Law and Dharmaśāstra. Donald R. Davis Jr (ed). London: Anthem Press.

Shah, R. C. (1983). Yeats and Eliot: Perspectives on India, New Delhi: Associated Publishing House.

Shah, R. C.( 1983). Yeats and Eliot: Perspectives on India. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.

Sharp, H. (ed.). (1920). Selections from Educational Records, Part I (1781–1839). Calcutta: Superintendent, Govt. Printing. Retrieved from

Southey, R. (1812). The Curse of Kehama. London: Printed for Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown, Paternoster-Row.

Stallworthy, J. (1968). Yeats: Last Poems: A Casebook. London: Macmillan.

Steiner, P. (1995). Russian Formalism. In R. Selden, (Ed.). The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, 8. (pp. 11-29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swami, K. (Ed. & Tr.). (1996). Parthsarthi Mishra’s Shastra Dipika. Delhi: Swami Rama Tirtha Mission.

Symons, A. (1905). Introduction. In: The Golden Threshold. Retrieved from

Tennyson, A. The Defence of Lucknow. Retrieved from

Tharoor, S. (2016). An Era of Darkness, New Delhi: Aleph.

The Indian National Party. (1915). British Rule in India Condemned by the British Themselves, London: The Indian National Party. Retrieved from

Trevelyan, G. O. (1876). The Life and Letters of Lord Macaulay. Vol I. London: Longmans, Green, PDF. Retrieved from

Viswanathan, G. (1998). Masks of Conquest: Literary Study and British Rule in India, New Delhi: ‎Oxford UP.

Watts, M. (2009). Neocolonialism and the Process of Decolonization. In: International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, Vol 7, (pp. 360-364). Nigel Thrift & Rob Kitchin, (Eds.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Wesseling, H. L. (1987). Towards a History of Decolonization. Itinerario, 11(2). 95-106.


Birje-Patil, J. (1977). Beneath the Axle-Tree. Delhi: Macmillan.

Chatterjee, U. (1988). English, August: An Indian Story. London: Faber and Faber.

Constitution of India. (2020). Part XVII, Clause 343 (2). Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India.

Dryden, J. (n.d.). All for Love. Retrieved from

Dryden, J. (rpt. 1971). Aureng-Zebe. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Retrieved from

Edge, Sir John. (1892). Beni Prasad Vs. Hardai Bibi. ILR 1892 (14) Allahabad 67 (FB). Allahabad Highcourt. Retrieved from

Katju, M. (1992). Sardar Mohammad Ansar Khan v. State of U.P. CMWP No. 8249 of 1990. Allahabad Highcourt. Retrieved from

Katju, M. (1993). Udai Shankar Singh v. Branch Manager, LIC, Bharwari. CMWP No. 3807 of 1993. Allahabad Highcourt. Retrieved from

Katju, M. (2008). Rajbir Singh Dalal v. Chaudhari Devi Lal University, Sirsa & Anr. Civil Appeal No. 4908 of 2008. Supreme Court of India. Retrieved from

Mahabharata [The]. (2020). Vol. 1-6. Gorkhpur: Gita Press.

Mahapatra, D. (2021). Must teach ancient Indian jurisprudence, throw out colonial law system: Nazeer. Retrieved from

Mustaque, A. Muhamed. (2018). Mr. Justice, Fathima Thasneem (Minor) & ors vs. The State of Kerala & ors, WP(C) No. 35293 of 2018. Kerala High Court. Retrieved from


O’Neill, A. (2021). India’s Share of Global Gross Domestic Product (GDP) 2026. Retrieved from

Patkar, J. (1927). Narayan Pundlik Valanju v. Laxman Daji Sirekar. ILR 1927(51) Bom784. Bombay High Court. Retrieved from

Privy Council. (1908). Kalgavda Tavanappa Patil v Somappa Tamangavda Patil (ILR 1908 (33) Bom 669. Bombay High Court. Retrieved from

PTI. (2021). “Indianisation of our legal system is need of the hour: Chief Justice of India”, The Times of India, Sep 18, 2021. Retrieved from

Wallis, J. K. (1917). V Subramania Ayyar v. Rathavelu Chetty. ILR 1917 (41) Ma 44 (FB). Madras High Court. Retrieved from

https://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/viewer.html?समर_शेष_है_-रामधारी_सिंह_ दिनकर|




How to Cite

Kumar Sharma, S. . . (2022). Reframing English Studies in India: Socio-Psycholinguistic Issues . East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 9(1).



Vol 9 No 1 (2022)