On cognition-based notions in compositional aspect incompatible with traditional grammar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/kabKeywords:
compositional aspect, verbal aspect, default sentence meaning, aspectual ambivalence, leaks, temporality of situation participants, NP-V-NP mappingAbstract
Compositional aspect is an extremely important cross-language and universal language phenomenon discovered by Henk Verkuyl, a Dutch linguist and logician, in 1971, published a year later. Compositional aspect appears to exist in all natural languages, and proof is being accumulated lately in favor of this thesis. In contrast to verbal aspect as found in the Slavic languages, Greek, Georgian, Chinese, etc., where it resides in verbs as lexical entries but is grammaticalized, compositional aspect exists at the level of the sentence. The paper discusses some major notions that, on the one hand, underlie the correct understanding of compositional aspect and, on the other, constitute at least some of the reasons for the absence of the article-aspect interplay, an important phenomenon, in English grammars and in the literature on English language teaching. Publications in these two fields are practically silent about a phenomenon that has otherwise been discussed in theoretical linguistics for decades. Theoretical linguistics itself, although cognizant of the article-aspect interplay, also abounds in misconceptualizations about aspect in general, reigning in it from as early as when compositional aspect was discovered. English grammars and the overall literature on English language teaching continue to remain silent on the article-aspect interplay even lately, despite the appearance in recent years of a couple of publications – successfully addressing the issue but isolated, including two revolutionary papers dealing with articles, determiners, quantifiers and similar elements taking part in the compositional effectuation of aspect.
Disclosure Statement
The author reported no potential conflicts of interest.
Downloads
References
Bakardzhieva-Morikang, S., & Kabakčiev, K. (2024). Ukrainian biaspectuality: An instantiation of compositional aspect in a verbal-aspect language. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 11(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2024.11.1.bak
Bulatović, V. (2013). Modern theories of aspect and Serbian EL2 learners. Belgrade English Language and Literature Studies, 5, 65–79. https://doi.org/10.18485/bells.2013.5.3
Bulatović, V. (2020). Thinking for speaking in the right aspect – on whether modern English grammars can do more. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 33(2), 384–415.
Bulatović, V. (2022). Aspect semantics and ESL article use. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 60(2), 491–521.
Declerck, R. (2006). The grammar of the English verb phrase: Volume 1: The grammar of the English tense system. Mouton de Gruyter.
Dimitrova, D. (2021). Aspect coercion in Greek aorist and perfect verb forms. Studies in Greek Linguistics, 41, 45–53.
Dimitrova, D., & Kabakčiev, K. (2021). Compositional and verbal aspect in Greek: The aorist/imperfect distinction and the article-aspect interplay. Athens Journal of Philology, 8(3), 181–206. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajp.8-3-2
Fenn, P. (2010). A student’s advanced grammar of English. Narr Francke.
Haxhillari, H. (2024). The category of determiner in Albanian. Athens Journal of Philology, 11(4), 327–338. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajp.11-4-4
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530
Kabakčiev, K. (2000). The article and the aorist/imperfect distinction in Bulgarian: An analysis based on cross-language ‘aspect’ parallelisms. Linguistics, 22, 643–672.
Kabakčiev, K. (2000). Aspect in English: A “common-sense” view of the interplay between verbal and nominal referents. Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2003.0080
Kabakčiev, K. (2019). On the history of compositional aspect: Vicissitudes, issues, prospects. Athens Journal of Philology, 6(3), 201–224. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajp.6-3-4
Kabakčiev, K. (2023). On the temporal values of situation-participant NP referents mapped from Bulgarian perfects with aorist and imperfect participles. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 10(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2023.10.1.kab
Kabakčiev, K. (2025). On the systematic misconceptualization of aspect East and West leading aspectology astray. Linguistic Studies, 49, 7–26. https://doi.org/10.31558/1815-3070.2025.49
Kutsarova, S. (2025a). An attempt at outlining the major features of compositional aspect in Modern Turkish. Athens Journal of Philology, 12(1), 49–74. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajp.12-1-3
Kutsarova, S. (2025b). On the Turkish transnumeral as an aspect effectuation device. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 12(1), 76–112. https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2025.12.1.kut
Schüller, S. (2005). Problematik der Darstellung von Aspektunterschieden in englischen Referenzgrammatiken. In H. Thomas (Ed.), Linguistische Dimensionen des Fremdsprachenunterrichts (pp. 29–42). Königshausen & Neumann.
Shabashvili, G., & Kabakčiev, K. (2021). Verbal aspect vis-à-vis compositional: A typological case study of Georgian, against Russian and English data. Studies in Greek Linguistics, 42, 375–384. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23601.25449
Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 66, 143–160.
Verkuyl, H. (1972). On the compositional nature of the aspects. Reidel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2478-4
Verkuyl, H. (1993). A theory of aspectuality: The interaction between temporal and atemporal structure. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597848
Verkuyl, H. (2022). The compositional nature of tense, mood and aspect. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108989732
Vounchev, B. (2007). Aspektialnite harakteristiki v novogratskiya ezik – sredstva za izrazyavane i semantika [Aspectual characteristics of Modern Greek – expression devices and their semantics]. Sofia University Press.
Wu, S. (2026). Pragmatic dimensions of aspects in English: Theory and practice. Athens Journal of Philology (forthcoming).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Krasimir Kabakciev

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0