Not just a pretty picture: Effects of colored drawings and photographs on living and nonliving things naming
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/marKeywords:
visual format , naming task, colored drawings, photographs , semantic domains, living things, nonliving thingsAbstract
Picture naming is the most commonly used task for assessing cognitive processes. Nowadays, the influence of stimulus format is a topic of discussion. According to some studies, the use of different visual formats affects concept recognition. Moreover, previous research has found that the use of either drawings or photos differentially influences the recognition of living things (LTs) and nonliving things (NLTs). However, other studies did not identify differences across formats. This study aimed to assess whether the visual format of pictorial stimuli affects performance in an oral naming task, particularly across semantic domains: LTs and NLTs. Fifty-six Spanish-speaking adults were randomly assigned to name the same set of concepts in coloured drawings or in photograph format. Accuracy and reaction times were analysed using generalised and linear mixed-effects models, respectively, with random intercepts for participants and items. No significant differences in accuracy were found between formats or semantic domains. However, participants named photographs significantly faster than drawings. Although NLTs were named faster than LTs, the difference did not reach statistical significance. While both formats yielded comparable accuracy, photographs facilitated faster lexical access, likely due to their higher visual iconicity. These findings supported the use of photographs in clinical, educational, and experimental research. The study also highlighted the value of using mixed-effects models and the need to develop culturally adapted pictorial sets for Latin American populations.
Funding
The study is carried out within the research project Access to Conceptual Representations from Different Visual Formats: Vector Drawings, Photographs, and Emoji supported by the National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Argentina
Disclosure Statement
The authors reported no potential conflicts of interest.
Downloads
References
Adams, J., Sherman, S. M., & Williams, H. L. (2024). Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart in photograph form: The Keele Photo Stimulus Set (KPSS). Behavior Research Methods, 56, 3861–3872. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02351-1
Adlington, R. L., Laws, K. R., & Gale, T. M. (2009). The Hatfield Image Test (HIT): a new picture test and norms for experimental and clinical use. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 31(6), 731-753. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13803390802488103
Bakhtiar, M., Nilipour, R., & Weekes, B. S. (2013). Predictors of timed picture naming in Persian. Behavior Research Methods, 45(3), 834-841. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0298-6
Bartos, A., & Diondet, S. (2024). Sensitive written hedgehog PICture Naming and Immediate Recall (PICNIR) as a valid and brief test of semantic and short-term episodic memory for very mild cognitive impairment. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 102(2), 396–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877241289385
Biederman, I., & Ju, G. (1988). Surface vs. edge-based determinants of visual recognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 38-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(88)90024-2
Bonin, P., Poulin-Charronnat, B., Lukowski Duplessy, H., Bard, P., Vinter, A., Ferrand, L., & Méot, A. (2020). IMABASE: A new set of 313 colourised line drawings standardised in French for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, age-of-acquisition, and imageability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 73(11), 1862–1878. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820932822
Brodeur, M. B., Guérard, K., & Bouras, M. (2014). Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS) Phase II: 930 new normative photos. PLoS ONE, 9(9), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106953
Brodeur, M. B., O’Sullivan, M., & Crone, L. (2017). The impact of image format and normative variables on episodic memory. Cognitive Science and Neuroscience, 4, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2017.1328869
Cycowicz, Y. M., Friedman, D., Rothstein, M., & Snodgrass, J. G. (1997). Picture naming by young children: Norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65(2), 171- 237. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1996.2356
Chainay, H., & Rosenthal, V. (1996). Naming and picture recognition in probable Alzheimer’s disease: Effects of color, generic category, familiarity, visual complexity, and shape similarity. Brain and Cognition, 30(3), 403–405.
Decuyper, C., Brysbaert, M., Brodeur, M. B., & Meyer, A. S. (2021). Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS): Dutch Names for 1400 Photographs. Journal of Cognition, 4(1): 33, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.180
Dimitropoulou, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., Blitsas, P., & Carreiras, M. (2009). A standardized set of 260 pictures for Modern Greek: norms for name agreement, age of acquisition, and visual complexity. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 584-589. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.584
Duñabeitia, J. A., Crepaldi, D., Meyer, A. S., New, B., Pliatsikas, C., Smolka, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2018). MultiPic: a standardized set of 750 drawings with norms for six European languages. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71(4), 808-816. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1310261
Foster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers, 35, 116-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03195503
Gaffan, D., & Heywood, C. (1993). A spurious category-specific visual agnosia for living things in normal human and nonhuman primates. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(1), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1993.5.1.118
Gisbert-Muñoz, S., Quiñones, I., Amoruso, L., Timofeeva, P., Geng, S., Boudelaa, S., Pomposo, I., Gil-Robles, S., Carreiras, M. (2021). MULTIMAP: Multilingual picture naming test for mapping eloquent areas during awake surgeries. Behavior Research Methods, 53(2), 918-927. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01467-4
Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Cascade processes in picture identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5(1), 67–103.
Krautz, A. E., & Keuleers, E. (2022). LinguaPix database: A megastudy of picture-naming norms. Behavior Research Methods, 54(2), 941–954. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01651-0
Laws, K. R. (1999). Gender affects latencies for naming living and nonliving things: implications for familiarity. Cortex, 35, 729–733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70831-1
Laws, K. R. (2000). Category-specificity naming errors in normal subjects: The influence of evolution and experience. Brain and Language, 75, 123-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2348
Lloyd-Jones, T. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Perceptual differentiation as a source of category effects in object processing: Evidence from naming and object decision. Memory and Cognition, 25, 18–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03197282
Manoiloff, L., Artstein, M., Canavoso, M., Fernández, L., & Seguí, J. (2010). Expanded norms for 400 experimental pictures in an Argentinean Spanish-speaking population. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 452-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.2.452
Martínez-Cuitiño, M., Peccin, A., Soriano, F., & Barreyro, J. P. (2019). Efectos categoriales en tareas de denominación y categorización de dibujos con y sin color. Cuadernos de Neuropsicología, 13(2), 37-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.7714/CNPS/13.2.203
Martínez-Cuitiño, M., Barreyro, J. P., Wilson, M., & Jaichenco, V. (2015). Nuevas normas semánticas y de tiempos de latencia para un set de 400 dibujos en español. Interdisciplinaria, 32(2), 289–305.
Martínez Cuitiño, M., & Jaichenco, V. (2015). Seres vivos y artefactos: ¿Efectos categoriales producto de la ausencia de color en tareas de denominación de dibujos? [Living things and artifacts: categorial effects in black-and-white picture naming tasks?]. Escritos en Psicología, 8(1), 57-68.
Martínez, N., Matute, H., & Goikoetxea, E. (2020). PicPsy: A new bank of 106 photographs and line drawings with written naming norms for Spanish-speaking children and adults. PLoS ONE, 15(9), Article e0238976. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238976
Martínez, N., & Matute, H. (2019). Examining the influence of picture format on children's naming responses. PeerJ, 7:e7692. http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7692
Moreno-Martinez, F.J., Montoro, P.R., & Laws, K.R. (2011). A set of high quality colour images with Spanish norms for seven relevant psycholinguistic variables: the Nombela naming test. Neuropsychology, Development, and Cognition. Section B. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition, 18(3), 293- 327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2010.540849
Moreno-Martínez, F. J., & Montoro, P. R. (2012). An ecological alternative to Snodgrass & Vanderwart: 360 high quality colour images with norms for seven psycholinguistic variables. PLoS ONE, 7(5), e37527.
Moreno-Martínez, F. J., & Moratilla-Pérez, I. (2016). Naming and categorization in healthy participants: Crowded domains and blurred effects of gender. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 19( e49), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2016.59
Ni, L., Liu, Y., Yu, W., & Fu, X. (2019). The China Image Set (CIS): A new set of 551 colored photos with Chinese norms for 12 psycholinguistic variables. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(10), 2631. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02631
Nishimoto, T., Miyawaki, K., Ueda, T., Une, Y., & Takahashi, M. (2005). Japanese normative set of 359 pictures. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 398–416. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192709
O'Sullivan, M., Lepage, M., Bouras, M., Montreuil, T., & Brodeur, M. D. (2012). North-American norms for name disagreement: pictorial stimuli naming discrepancies. PLOS ONE, 7(10), e47802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047802
Paplikar, A., Varghese, F., Alladi, S., Vandana, V. P., Darshini, K. J., Iyer, G. K., Kandukuri, R., Divyaraj, G., Sharma, M., Dhaliwal, R. S., Kaul, S., Saroja, A. O., Ghosh, A., Sunitha, J., Khan, A. B., Mathew, R., Mekala, S., Menon, R., Nandi, R., Narayanan, J., … ICMR Neuro Cognitive Tool Box Consortium (2022). Picture-naming test for a linguistically diverse population with cognitive impairment and dementia. International journal of language & communication disorders, 57(4), 881–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12728
Protopapas, A. (2007). Check Vocal: A program to facilitate checking the accuracy and response time of vocal responses from DMDX. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 859–862. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03192979
Raman, I., Raman, E., & Mertan, B. (2014). A standardized set of 260 pictures for Turkish: norms of name and image agreement, age of acquisition, visual complexity, and conceptual familiarity. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 588-595. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0376-4
Rossion, B., & Pourtois, G. (2001). Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object database: Color and texture improve object recognition. Journal of Vision, 1(3), 413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/1.3.413
Rossion, B., & Pourtois, G. (2004). Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception, 33(2), 217-236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p5117
Salmon, J. P., Matheson, H. E., & McMullen, P. A. (2014). Photographs of manipulable objects are named more quickly than the same objects depicted as line drawings: evidence that photographs engage embodiment more than line drawings. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1187. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01187
Saryazdi, R., Bannon, J., Rodrigues, A., Klammer, C., & Chambers, C. G. (2018). Picture perfect: a stimulus set of 225 pairs of matched clipart and photographic images normed by Mechanical Turk and laboratory participants. Behavior Research Methods, 50(6), 2498-2510. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1028-5
Shao, Z., & Stiegert, J. (2016). Predictors of photograph naming: Dutch norms for 327 photographs. Behavior Research Methods, 48(2), 577–584. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0613-0
Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.6.2.174
Snodgrass, J. G., & Yuditsky, T. (1996). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28(4), 516-536. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200540
Snow, J. C., Skiba, R. M., Coleman, T. L., & Berryhill, M. E. (2014). Real-world objects are more memorable than photographs of objects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 837. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00837
Souza, C., Garrido, M. V., & Carmo, J. C. (2020). A systematic review of normative studies using images of common objects. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 573314. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573314
The Jamovi Project (2024). Jamovi. (Version 2.6) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org.
Tsaparina, D., Bonin, P., & Méot, A. (2011). Russian norms for name agreement, image agreement for the colorized version of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures and age of acquisition, conceptual familiarity, and imageability scores for modal object names. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 1085-1099. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0121-9
Vivas, L., Manoiloff, L., Linares, N., Fernández Zaionz, A., & Montero, L. (2022). Argentinean Psycholinguistic Picture Naming Test in color. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 29(4), 527–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2020.1780238
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Macarena Martínez-Cuitiño *, Dolores Zamora, Josefina Castillo Cerutti, Nicolás Nahuel Romero, Juan Pablo Barreyro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0