The Russia-Ukraine War in Western Mediа:  A Psycholinguistic Modelling of the ‘Hybrid’ Phase

Ivan Danyliuk; Olena Bohucharova

doi:10.29038/eejpl.2023.10.2.dan

Автор(и)

Ivan Danyliuk Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine
Olena Bohucharova * Donetsk State University of Internal Affairs, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2023.10.2.dan

Ключові слова:

Ukraine, “cold” phase, English linguistic media-consciousness, concepts, media-discourse, “soft” cognitive media-modeling, war

Анотація

The article presents a conceptualisation of English-language media discourse in the retrospective of the 'hybrid' phase of the Russia-Ukraine war from 2014 to 2021. The study aims to analyse the psycholinguistic features of the cognitive modelling of the war in Ukraine in English-language media and investigate the psychosemantic components of the Western media audience's attitude towards the war. Psycholinguistic media monitoring, discourse analysis, semantic-cognitive analysis, content analysis, and the Semantic Differential (SD) were used to study the media discourse of the Russia-Ukraine war. The results indicate that the discourse is emotionally positive but controversial, which may hinder the Western audience's understanding of the realities of the war. The newspaper media discourse includes psychosemantic components such as neutral concepts like 'conflict' and 'crisis'. These concepts are often expressed through conceptual metaphors such as 'war' which can be viewed as a path, a game, a business, or a theatre. Additionally, euphemisms and abbreviations (such as ATO) are commonly used, along with an abundance of vocabulary that has positive connotations. There has been a shift in emphasis from the strong concept of 'war' to neutral academic nominalisations, such as 'event'. The results of the study confirmed the paradoxical perception of the war by the Western media audience. As military activity intensifies, positive assessments of the victorious war tend to decrease, leading to a drop in media ratings. These findings have potential applications in studying Western attitudes towards war and in the cognitive modelling of media content. This is particularly relevant given the future dangers of Russian aggression in 2022.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

* Corresponding author: Olena Bohucharova

Завантажити

Дані для завантаження поки недоступні.

Посилання

Austin, J. L., & Urmson, J. O. (1962). How to do things with words: the William James lectures at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford University Press. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0149.1963.tb00768.x

Bacallao-Pino, L.M. (2016). Transmedia events: media coverage of global transactional repertoires of collective action. In B. Mitu, S. Poulakidakos, (Eds.). Media events: a critical contemporary approach (pp.189-206). Palgrave Macmillan. http://doi.org/10.1057/9781137574282_11

Bachmann, S., & Gunneriusson, H. (2015). Russia’s hybrid warfare in the east: the integral nature of the information sphere. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 16(3-4), 198-211.

Bell, A. (1995). Language and the media. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500002592

Berg, E., & Mölder, M. (2018). The politics of unpredictability: Acc/secession of Crimea and the blurring of international norms. East European Politics, 34 (4), 400-417. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2018.1497986

Broslavska, L. Ya. (2015). Obrazno-tsinnisnyi skladnyk contseptu WAR / ВІЙНА v Amerykanskii kartyni svitu [Imaginative-value constituent of the concept WAR in the American linguistic world image]. Research Journal of Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University. Series Philology (Linguistics), 4, 22-27. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/nvddpufm_ 2015_4_6

Buckholz, Q. (2017). The dogs that did not bark: elite preferences and the failure of separatism in Kharkiv and Dnipropetrovsk. Problems of Post-Communism, 66(3), 1-10. http://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2017.1367256

Dayan D., & Katz E. (1992). Media events: The live broadcasting of history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Dodonov, R. (2015). Kryza, viyna chy konflikt – yak korektno nazyvaty podiyi na Skhodi Ukrainy? [Crisis, war or conflict – how to call the events in eastern Ukraine? Ukrainian Institute for Global Development and Adaptation Strategies. Retrieved from https://uisgda.com/ua/kriza-_vjna_21.02.2015_chi_konflkt_-_yak_korektno_nazivati_pod_na_shod_ukrani.html

Driscoll, J. (2019). Ukraine’s civil war: Would accepting this terminology help resolve the conflict? PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo, 572. Retrieved from http://www.ponarseurasia.org/memo/ukraines-civil-war-wouldaccepting-terminology-help-resolve-conflict.

Imbir, К. К. (2017). Valence and origin of emotional words influence subsequent perception of ambiguous stimuli regarding competence versus warmth. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46, 1549-1571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9505-z

Foltovych, V., Korobchynskyi, M., Chyrun, L., & Vysotska, V. (2017). Method of content-analysis of textual information of an online newspaper. Bulletin of the Lviv Polytechnic National University. Computer Science and Information Technology, 864, 7-19. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/VNULPKNIT_2017_864_4.

Giles, D. (2003). Media psychology. New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/ 9781410607263

Geeraerts, D. (2006). A rough guide to cognitive linguistics. In D. Geeraerts, (Ed.). Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings. (pp. 1-28). Mouton de Gruyter.

Gomez, M.C. (2009). Towards a new approach to the linguistic definition of euphemism. Language Sciences, 31(6), 725–739. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2009.05.001

Howard, J (2019b). Dangerous speech. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 47, 208-254.

Karimnia, A., & Khodashenas, M. (2016). Winter and spring. Euphemistic strategies used by Iranian EFL learners: death and lying in focus. The Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 4(1), 60-69. http://doi.org/10.22049/jalda.2018.26169.1052.

Kellner, D. (2010). Media spectacle and media events. In N. Couldry, A. Hepp, F. Krotz, (Eds.). Media events in a global age (pp. 76-91). Routledge. http://doi.org/10.1177/17427665110070020702

Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A.Ortony, (Ed.). Metaphor and thought (pp. 202-251). 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.

Machykova, M. (2015). Media v konteksti psyholingvistyky ta media psyholohii[Media within psycholinguistic and media psychological context]. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2(2), 118-126. Retrieved from http://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/ 123456789/9379

Matsiyevsky, Yu. (2019). Vnutrishnii conflict chy prykhovana ahresiia: Akademichna dyskusiia i ekspertni otsinky viyny na Dondasi [Internal conflict or hidden aggression: competing accounts and expert assessments of the war in Ukraine’s Donbas]. Political Life, 2, 55-68. http://doi.org/10.31558/2519-2949.2019.2.9

Monitorynhovyi proekt “Oko” [Eye Monitoring Project] (2017). Annual monitoring report “Ukraine in the world’s online media for 2016”. Retrieved from http://967609.istudi03.web.hostingtest.net/wpcontent/uploads/2017/05/Annual_report_print.pdf.

Naydonova, L. A. (2013). Osnovy mediapsykholohii: Kontseptualna terytoriia i kohnityvvnyi landshaft [Foundations of media psychology: a conceptual territory and cognitive landscape]. Current Issues of Psychology. Psychology of Creativity, 12(16), 316-322. http://www.appsychology.org.ua/index.php/ua/arkhiv

Neverson, N., & Adeyanju, C.T. (2018). Worth a thousand words: tasers, new media events, and narrative struggle. Journalism Studies, 19(11), 1633-1651. http://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2017.1289113

Nye, J. S. (Jnr) (2011). The future of power. Public Affairs.

Osgood, C.E. (1952). The nature and measurement of meaning. Psychological Bulletin, 49, 197-237. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055737

Panther, К., & Thornburg, L. (2017). Metaphor and metonymy in language and thought: a cognitive linguistic approach. Synthesis Philosophica, 64(2), 271–294. http://dx.doi.org/10.21464/sp32202

Pavlenko, V.V. (2015). Kohnityvnyi pidhid do vyvchennia media dyskursu [Cognitive approach to media discourse study]. State and Regions. Series Social Communication, 4(24). 48-51.

Rumyantseva, E.A. (2014). Political metaphor in Ukraine (on the material of English-language media). Language and Culture,17(3), 18–28.

Saussure, F. de (1995). Cours de Linguistique Générale. Publié par Ch. Bally et A. Séchehaye; avec la collaboration de A. Riedlinger; ed. critique préparée par T. de Mauro; postf. de L. J. Calvet. Payot. http://doi.org/10.1093/fs/50.1.109-a

Sumiala, J., Tikka, M., Huhtamäki, J., & Valaskivi, K. (2016). #JeSuisCharlie: Towards a multi-method study of hybrid media events. Media and Communication, 4(4), 97-108. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i4.593

Taranenko, O. V. (2017a). Dolannia evfemizatsii v “movi viyny” Ukrainskohi mediinoho ta politychnoho dyskursu [Overcoming euphemism in the “language of war” of Ukrainian media and political discourse). Journalistic Sciences, 883, 139-143. Retrieved from http://ena.lp.edu.ua:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/ntb/43013/2017n883_Taranenko_Overcoming_euphemization_139-143.pdf?equence=2&isAllowed=y.

Tatsenko, N. V. (2013). Semantic and pragmatic aspects of euphemism in English-language political discourse (based on the material of Barack Obama’s speeches). Scientific notes of the Taurida V. I. Vernadskу National University. Series Philology. Social Communications, 26(65), 1, 164-168

Vasianovych, Ye. (2018). Strukturno-semantychne napovnennia kontseptu “Viyna” u lingvistychnykh doslidzhenniakh [Structural-semantic meaning of the “War” concept in linguistic research. Humanities Education in Technical Higher Educational Institutions, 38, 5-10. https://doi.org/10.18372/2520-6818.38.13255

Vilchynska, T. P. (2017). Kontsept “viyna”: Osoblyvosti movnoiyi obiektyvatsii u hazetnomy teksti [The concept of “war”: features of linguistic objectification in a newspaper text]. Linguistic Studies, 34, 110-114.

Zasiekina, L. V. (2010). Profiles of word meaning as a function of cognition and culture. Scientific Notes of National University of Ostroh Academy. Series Psychology and Pedagogy, 14, 66-75.