Metaphoric consideration of the UKRAINE concept significance in the non-Ukrainian journalistic discourse and its influence on social and linguistic consciousness – A corpus research of the 2022-2025 wartime period
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2025.12.1.steKeywords:
Ukraine, wartime, foreign mind, concept, layer model, image, associations, conceptual metaphor, corpusAbstract
The article studies associations of the Ukrainian topic in non-Ukrainian journalistic sources of the 2022-2025 wartime period to define how importance of Ukrainian support is regarded from the worldwide safety perspective. The research relies on heritage of the Ukrainian cognitive linguistics where concept is treated as a dynamic layer unity of notion, image and values, which develops in the constantly evolving discourse as social and linguistic consciousness with a changeable public attitude to its essence. The research is conducted via corpus as a mini-model of discourse. The News on the Web (NOW) Corpus is selected as the most authentic base of permanently updating resources since 2010 till today. 122 journalistic sources are taken from the NOW Corpus to produce a 230-context sample of Ukrainian metaphoric associations in the non-Ukrainian press. The sample is processed via the Lakoff-Johnson conceptual metaphor methodology to provide a list of images non-Ukrainians associate Ukraine with. All 421 detected cases of metaphoric associations are sorted by decreasing frequency in mental clusters (law, biology, structure, labor, psychology, science, economics, art and leisure, interpersonal communication). It produces a metaphoric spectrum from the most to least relevant images of the UKRAINE concept within the non-Ukrainian community. Consequently, UKRAINE is associated as ORGANISM; HUMAN; BUILDING; WARRIOR; LEGAL STATUS. Moderate considerations are reflected via metaphors UKRAINE as GAME; VICTIM; MACHINE; PHYSICAL BODY; OWNER; PARTNER; TARGET; OFFENDER; PRODUCT. The least frequent metaphors are UKRAINE is TEAM; FRAGMENTED OBJECT; COMPLEX OBJECT; SINGLE OBJECT; PROPERTY; IDEA; AUTHORITY; JESUS CHRIST; ANIMAL; PLANT; VEHICLE; FAMILY; CONSUMER; RESOURCE; LIQUID; SOLID; DEBTOR; ACCUSER; LEGAL SUBJECT; FLAME; LESSON; WRITTEN TEXT; PASSENGER; SCALES; GARMENT; GLASSWARE; PICTURE; RESEARCHER; EQUATION; RIVAL; BOMB. The results are open for specification (new samples of the UKRAINE concept may be processed because the war is not over and future non-Ukrainian associations may differ, respectively).
Acknowledgements
The study has been carried out under the project Commemoration of the Russian-Ukrainian War within the State Humanitarian Policy: Formation of a Sustainable Model of Ukrainian Society Consolidation funded by the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, State Reg. No. 0121U112686, Funding contract No. БФ/23-2021. As project performers, Vitalii Stepanov, Olena Yemelianova and Maryna Nabok greatly appreciate research supervision, advice and support of Svitlana Baranova, an article co-author and representative of another Sumy State University project (grant of the National Research Foundation of Ukraine Innovative Technologies of the Mass Consciousness Manipulation: A Polyparadigmatic Linguistic Dimension, State Reg. No. 0124U004832).
Disclosure Statement
The authors reported no potential conflict of interests.
Downloads
References
Abdel-Qader, L. M., & Al-Khanji, R. R. (2022). Conceptual metaphor in COVID-19 speeches of the American president Joe Biden. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(4), 810-818. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1204.24.
Baker, P., Hardie, A., & McEnery, T. (2006). Glossary of Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh University Press.
Bekhta, I. A., & Bekhta, T. O. (2019). Literary text: Psycholinguistic reflection of the concept. Scientific Notes of the National University “Ostroh Academy”. Series: Philology, 6(74), 11-14.
Bieliekhova, L. I. (2002). The Figurative Space of American Poetry: The Linguistic-Cognitive Aspect. Unpublished DSc in Philology thesis. Kyiv National Linguistic University.
Benzi, M., & Novarese, M. (2022). Metaphors we lie by: Our “war” against COVID-19. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 44(18), 1-22. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-022-00501-2.
Bondarenko, Y. V. (2017). MEME and ANTIMEME in political media discourse: Cognitive modeling experience. In N. V. Petliuchenko (Ed.), Concepts and Contrasts (pp. 347-354). Helvetica. Retrieved from https://dspace.onua.edu.ua/items/bf4d1757-b4d5-4e0f-b2ae-cb896e471f9d.
Bondarenko, Y. V., Martyniuk, A. P., Frolova, I, Y., & Shevchenko, I. S. (2017). How to Draw a Bird’s Portrait: The Methodology of the Language Cognitive-Communicative Analysis. V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University.
Borysov, O. O. (2005). Linguistic Means of Expressing the Emotional Concept of FEAR: The Linguistic-Cognitive Aspect (Based on the Contemporary English-Language Fiction). Unpublished PhD thesis. Donetsk National University.
Diedkova, G., & de Landtsheer, Ch. (2018). Going negative by metaphors: The Donbass conflict in the Russian and the Ukrainian press. Politics, Culture and Socialization, 9(1-2), 7-34. https://doi.org/10.3224/pcs.v9i1-2.02.
Jamal, M., & Zhang, R. (2025). Critical metaphor analysis of the White Paper “Fighting COVID-19: China in Action” from the perspective of conceptual blending theory. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 16(2), 627-638. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1602.29.
Jiang, M. (2023). The COVID-19 and war: Analysis of conceptual metaphors of the pandemic in the Chinese press. Circulo de Linguistica Aplicada a la Comunicacion, 95, 277-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/clac.77727.
Kiklewicz, A. (2024). The metaphorical nomination of war in journalistic texts on the Russian invasion of Ukraine – as exemplified by the weekly “Polityka”. Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski, 15(2), 213-235. https://doi.org/10.31648/pw.10874.
Kolegaieva, I. M. (2018). Forming nominative field of a concept: Stages and units. Writings in Romance-Germanic Philology, 1(40), 121-127. https://doi.org/10.18524/2307-4604.2018.1(40).137068.
Kövecses, Z. (2020). Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Lahlou, H., & Rahim, H. A. (2022). Conceptual metaphors in North African French-speaking news discourse about COVID-19. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(3), 589-600. http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i3.35949.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
Lomonosova, K. (2013). Texts of small form: The linguistic and stylistic aspect. Bulletin of Lviv University. Series “Journalism”, 38, 325-333. Retrieved from http://publications.lnu.edu.ua/bulletins/index.php/journalism/article/view/5387/5397.
Martyniuk, A. P. (2012). Discourse. In A. P. Martyniuk (Ed.), The dictionary of main terms of the cognitive-discourse linguistics (pp. 11-21). V.N.Karazin Kharkiv National University.
Morozova, O. (2017). Monomodal and multimodal instantiations of conceptual metaphors of Brexit. Lege Artis. Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, 2(2), 250-283. https://doi.org/10.1515/lart-2017-0017.
Nikonova, V. H. (2005). Artistic concepts in Shakespeare’s tragedies: Identification methods. Bulletin of Cherkasy University. Series: Philological Sciences, 78, 21-32.
Nytspol V. I., & Kobuta, S. S. (2022). Conceptual metaphor of Russian-Ukrainian war in American media discourse. International Humanitarian University Herald. Series “Philology”, 56, 111-114. https://doi.org/10.32841/2409-1154.2022.56.24.
Oliynyk, N., & Shevchenko, I. (2016). Conceptualization of ECONOMIC CRISIS in discourse: From the Great Depression to the Great Recession. Advanced Education, 6, 76-81. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.78867.
Pawliszko, J. (2025). Framing the Russian-Ukrainian conflict: The role of metaphor, nominalization, and appraisal in shaping media narratives. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 25(1), 156-175. http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2025-2501-09.
Pocheptsov, H. H. (1996). Theory of Communication. Ukrainian Advertising Association, Ukrainian Public Relations Association.
Prykhodko, A. M. (2008). Concepts and Concept Systems in the Cognitive-Discourse Paradigm of Linguistics. Premier.
Selivanova, O. O. (2008). Cognitive linguistics and linguoconceptology. In O. O. Selivanova (Ed.), Modern linguistics: Directions and problems (pp. 365-430). Dovkillia-K.
Šeškauskienė, I. & Ostanina-Olszewska, J. (2016). Conceptualizing events in Ukraine: A cross-cultural analysis of online news reports. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 11(2), 247-270. https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2015-0013.
Shevchenko, I. S. (2013). Speech act and discourse from the cognitive-pragmatic and historical perspectives. In L. M. Chernovatyi, O. A. Kalnychenko, & O. V. Rebrii (Eds.), Translation in the studies of the Kharkiv School scholars (pp. 117-134). Nova Knyha.
Starko, V. F. (2004). Kontsept HRA v konteksti slovianskykh i germanskykh kultur (nf materiali ukrainskoyi, rosiiskoyi ta nimetskoyi mov)[The Concept of GAME in the Context of Slavic and Germanic Cultures (Based on the Ukrainian, Russian, English, and German Languages)]. Unpublished PhD thesis. Oleksandr Potebnia NASU Institute of Linguistics.
Stepanov, V., Reshytko, A., & Kobiakova, I. (2023). The mental consideration of resilience as a relevant social concept (a corpus-based research of American English). Topics in Linguistics, 24(2), 69-90. https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2023-0012.
Stojan, N., & Mijić, S. N. (2019). Conceptual metaphors in political discourse in Croatian, American and Italian Newspapers. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 8(1), 69-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/ajis-2019-0007.
Taranenko, L. I. (2014). Actualization of English Prose Folklore Texts of Small Form. Kafedra.
Tatsenko, N. V. (2017). The Empathy Realization in the Modern English-Language Discourse: The Cognitive-Synergetic Aspect. Sumy State University.
Truc, T. T. T. (2024). Analyzing war metaphors in the context of the COVID-19: A critical metaphor analysis. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(6), 1959-1966. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1506.21.
Vorobiova, O. P. (2004). Cognitive poetics: Achievements and prospects. Bulletin of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 635, 18-22.
Yehorova, O. I., & Rohoza, I. K. (2015). Metaphorical conceptualization of MAIDAN (on the material of German Internet mass media). Scientific Notes of the M. Hohol Nizhyn State University. Series “Philology”, 3, 98-102. Retrieved from http://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/44410.
Zhabotynska, S. A. (2013). The name as a text: Conceptual network of lexical meaning (analysis of the name of emotion). Cognition, Communication, Discourse, 6, 47-76. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2013-06-04
Zhulavska, O. A. (2011). Aktualizatsiia kontseptu ‘Terroryzm’ u suchasnomu brytanskomu hazetnomu dyskursi. [Actualization of the TERRORISM Concept in the Contemporary British Newspaper Discourse]. Unpublished PhD thesis. Sumy State University.
Sources
British National Corpus [BNC] (2025). Retrieved from https://www.english-corpora.org/bnc.
Corpus of Contemporary American English [COCA] (2025). Retrieved from https://www.english-corpora.org/coca.
News on the Web Corpus [NOW] (2025). Retrieved from https://www.english-corpora.org/now.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Vitalii Stepanov, Olena Yemelianova, Svitlana Baranova, Maryna Nabok
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0