The Concept of Betrayal in the Consciousness of the English: A Psycholinguistic Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/Keywords:
word association test, consciousness, concept, verbalisation, associationAbstract
The study attempts to reveal verbal, that is, lexically materialised associative responses of English respondents to the word stimulus’ betrayal’. As the word association test is considered a reliable way of studying the content of the national mental image of a specific concept, the method allowed to receive a collective linguistic representation of the researched concept reflected in the consciousness of the tested participants. The association test was held with undergraduate and postgraduate students, respondents with bachelor’s and master’s degrees who were native speakers of English and residents of London (England), aged 18 to 25 (365 males, 411 females). The test results show that the English associate the concept of BETRAYAL with a traitor. They clearly identify the subjects of betrayal – specific persons (historical, public, political figures, heroes of cartoons and literary works) with whom the objects of betrayal were in a close, trusting relationship. The characteristic features of traitors are treachery, lack of empathy, and the desire to hurt deliberately. The motivations behind such persons’ behavioural scenarios are deception, fraud, and searching for personal gain. In the consciousness of English speakers, such behaviour is verbalised as a shameful act, a crime that must be punished. Betrayal causes negative emotions and is characterised as harmful, destructive, and disgusting.
Downloads
References
Durkheim, E. (1998). De la Division du Travail Social. Quadridge: Presses Universitaires de France.
Evans, V. (2009). How words mean: Lexical concepts, Cognitive Models and Meaning Construction. Oxford University Press.
Eve, M. (2002). Is friendship a sociological topic? European J. of sociology = archives européennes de sociologie, 43 (3), 386–409. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975602001157
Freeman, P. (2008). Julius Caesar. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Хижняк О. В. Культура довіри в рекламі та PR технологіях: практикум. Харків: Харківський національний університет імені В. Н. Каразіна, 2017.
Khyzhniak, O. V. (2017). Kultura Doviry v Reklami ta PR Tekhnolohiiakh: Praktykum [Culture of trust in advertising and PR technologies: workshop]. Kharkiv: Kharkivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni V. N. Karazina. ISBN 978-966-285-369-8.
Kuzembayeva, G. (2023). Axiological dimension of citizenship and patriotism in a worldview of Kazakhs: A psycholinguistic study. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 10(1), 116-135. https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2023.10.1.kuz
Мартінек, С. (2011). Емпіричні й експериментальні методи у сучасній когнітивній лінгвістиці. Вісник Львівського університету. Серія філологічна. 52. 25–32.
Martinek, S. (2011). Empirychni y eksperymentalni metody u suchasnii kohnityvnii linhvistytsi [Empirical and experimental methods in modern cognitive linguistics]. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Seriia Filolohichna. 52, 25–32.
Мізін, К. І. (2016). Верифікація лінгвокультурної релевантності концептів за допомогою методики психолінгвістичного експерименту. Психолінгвістика. 19 (2), 32–46.
Mizin, K. I. (2016). Veryfikatsiia linhvokulturnoi relevantnosti kontseptiv za dopomohoiu metodyky psykholinhvistychnoho eksperymentu [Verification of linguistic and cultural relevance of concepts using the method of psycholinguistic experiment]. Psycholinguistics, 19 (2), 32–46.
Мізін, К. І. (2008). Психолінгвістичний експеримент чи соціолінгвістичний моніторинг? Епістемологічні пошуки аксіологічної фразеології. Мовознавство. 1 (244), 67-79.
Mizin, K. I. (2008). Psykholinhvistychnyi eksperyment chy sotsiolinhvistychnyi monitorynh? Epistemolohichni poshuky aksiolohichnoi frazeolohii [Psycholinguistic experiment or sociolinguistic monitoring? Epistemological searches of axiological phraseology]. Movoznavstvo, 1 (244), 67-79.
Опейда, Л. (2015). Цілісність як сенс людського буття. Людинознавчі студії. Серія: Філософія. 32, 239-247.
Opeida, L. M. (2015). Tsilisnist yak sens liudskoho buttia [Wholeness as the meaning of human existence]. Liudynoznavchi studii: zbirnyk naukovykh prats Drohobytskoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu im. Ivana Franka. Seriia : Filosofiia, 32, 239–247.
Ryspayeva, D., Akhmetova, G., Borgul, N., & Iskakova, G. (2024). Mechanisms of Concept Verbalization in the Ethnolinguistic Context. Journal Psycholinguist Research, 53 (4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-024-10089-2
Ulmer, J. T. (2000). Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance. Elsevier.
Vela-McConnell, J. A. (2017). The sociology of friendship. In Cambridge Handbook Of Sociology, (pp. 229–236). K. O. Korgen (ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316418369.024
Sources
Association / Definition, Types & Examples. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from:
https://www.britannica.com/science/association-psychology
Oxford Living Dictionaries (OLD). Retrieved from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com
Online Etymology Dictionary. Etymonline. (n.d.). (ED) Retrieved from https://www.etymonline.com/
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dr.Mariia Yu. Ivanchenko, Prof. Iryna Kolegaeva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.