Representation of the Rules for Living in Personal Narratives of Adolescents with Hearing Impairments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2021.8.2.lytKeywords:
personal narrative, content analysis, rules for living, core beliefs, adolescence, hearing impairmentsAbstract
The article is focused on the study of personal narratives of adolescents with hearing impairments. The aim of the study was to determine narrative indicators of respondents’ rules for living. To achieve this goal, there were analysed personal narratives of adolescents with hearing impairments. Besides, there were identified specific categories that reflect their rules for living. In addition, there was studied the level of subjective well-being of respondents and the relationship between the presentation of certain rules for living in personal narratives and the level of subjective satisfaction with life. The research methods were content analysis of personal narratives and subjective scaling. Statistical data processing was performed with the help of recursive division trees method. The results of the study show that rules for living typical for adolescents with hearing impairments are reflected in their narratives and can be divided into three groups. The first group includes self-focusing rules, the second – focusing on others, and the third – focusing on the out-world. Each of these groups is divided into two subgroups, and each subgroup includes the behaviour of supercompensation or avoidance. The most common among adolescents with hearing impairments are rules for living related to the focusing on others and self-focusing both by the type of avoidance. At the same time, the highest level of subjective satisfaction with life is connected with self-focusing rules for living by type of supercompensation. The obtained data allow us to conclude that the analysis of personal narratives of adolescents with hearing impairments allows to determine their rules for living. On the other hand, typical rules for living determine the level of person’s subjective well-being. Prospects for further researches in this area are to study the representation in adolescents’ narratives not only separate rules for living, but also core beliefs, the existence of which is ensured by these rules.
Downloads
References
Арнц А. Схема-терапія: модель роботи з частками. Львів: Свічадо, 2014.
Василюк О. Автобіографічний наратив як діагностичний інструментарій під час дослідженні травматичної пам’яті. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics. 2014. Том 1, №1. С. 201–208.
Жорняк Е. С. Нарративная психотерапия. Журнал практической психологии и психоанализа. 2005. № 4. С. 75–87.
Казанцева Е. В. Психологический субстрат нарративной схемы. Психолог. 2018. №1. С. 39 – 48. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8701.2018.1.24412
Литвиненко О. О. Індивідуально-психологічні особливості сприймання літературного тексту [Дис. канд. психол. наук]. КНУ імені Т. Г. Шевченка, 2014.
Масієнко Ю. О. Структурно-динамічні ознаки «Я-тексту» особистості [Автореф. дис. канд. психол. наук]. КНУ імені Т. Г. Шевченка, 2006.
Чепелєва Н. В. & Яковенко Л. П. Методи аналізу оповідального тексту. Технології розвитку інтелекту. 2013. № 4. С. 231–238.
Шимко В. До питання про місце і роль мови в процесі соціалізації особистості: структурно-онтологічний ескіз. Psycholinguistics. 2019. Вип. 26, № 1. С. 385–400. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2019-26-1-385-400
Юрьева Н. М. Интерактивный компонент в механизме порождения нарратива детьми. Вопросы психолингвистики. 2018. Т. 1, № 35. С. 115–125. https://doi.org/10.30982/2077-5911-2018-35-1-115-125
Bauer, J. & McAdams, D. (2010). Eudaimonic growth: Narrative growth goals predict increases in ego development and subjective well-being 3 years later. Developmental Psychology, 46(4), 761–772. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019654
Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
De Fina, A. (2020). Doing Narrative Analysis from a Narratives-as-Practices Perspective. Narrative Inquiry, 17, 32–45. https://doi.org//10.1075/ni.20067.def
Frank, St. L. & Christiansen, M. (2018). Hierarchical and sequential processing of language. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(9), 1213–1218. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1424347
Harre, R. (2002). Cognitive Science. A Philosophical Introduction. Sage Publications.
Hothorn, Т., Hornik, К. & Zeileis, A. (2006). Unbiased Recursive Partitioning: A Conditional Inference Framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 15(3), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1198/106186006X133933
Mitchell, T. R. & Braham, L. G. (2011). The Psychological Treatment Needs of Deaf Mental Health Patients in High-Secure Settings: A Review of the Literature. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10(2), 92–106. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/14999013.2011.577135
Reagan, Т., Matlins, P. & Pielick, D. (2021) Deaf epistemology, sign language and the education of deaf children. Educational Studies, 57(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2021.1878178
Sarbin, T. (1986). Narrative psychology: the storied nature of human conduct. Harvard University Press.
Stephens, C. & Breheny, M. (2015). Narrative Analysis in Psychological Research: An Integrated Approach to Interpreting Stories. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 10, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2011.586103
Van Dijk, Т. (2008). Philosophy of Action and Theory of Narrative. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Vernon, M. & Andrews, J. (2010). The Psychology of Deafness. Longman.
Westbrook, D., Kennerley, H., & Kirk, J. (2007). An Introduction to Cognitive Behavioural Therapy. Sage Publications.
Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis. Sage. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781849208765
References (translated and transliterated)
Arntz, A. (2020) Skhema-terapiya: model roboty z chastkamy [Scheme-Therapy: a Model of Work with Particles]. Lviv: Svichado.
Vasylyuk, O. (2014). Avtobiohrafichnyy naratyv yak diahnostychnyy instrumentariy pid chas doslidzhenni travmatychnoyi pam’yati [Autobiographical narrative as a diagnostic tool in the study of traumatic memory]. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 1(1), 201–208.
Zhornyak, E. S. (2005). Narratyvnaya psykhoterapyya [Narrative psychotherapy]. Zhurnal Praktycheskoy Psykholohii i Psykhoanalyza, 4, 75–87.
Kazantseva, Ye.V. (2018). Psikhologicheskiy substrat narrativnoy skhemy [The Psychological Substrate of the Narrative Scheme]. Psikholog, 1, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8701.2018.1.24412
Lytvynenko, O. O. (2014). Indyvidualʹno-psykholohichni osoblyvosti spryymannya literaturnoho tekstu [Individual-psychological peculiarities of literary text perception]. Unpublished PhD thesis. Taras Shevchenko University of Kyiv.
Masiyenko, Yu. (2006). Strukturno-dynamichni oznaky “YA-tekstu” osobystosti [Structural and dynamic features of “self-text” of personality]. Extended abstract of PhD thesis. Taras Shevchenko University of Kyiv.
Chepelyeva, N. V. & Yakovenko, L. P. (2013). Metody analizu opovidalʹnoho tekstu [Methods of Analysis of the Narrative Text]. Tekhnolohiyi Rozvytku Intelektu, 4, 231–238.
Shymko, V. (2019). Do pytannya pro mistse i rolʹ movy v protsesi sotsializatsiyi osobystosti: strukturno-ontolohichnyy eskiz [On the question of the place and role of language in the process of personality socialization: structural-ontological sketch]. Psycholinguistics, 26(1), 385–400. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2019-26-1-385-400
Yuryeva, N. M. (2018). Interaktivnyy komponent v mekhanizme porozhdeniya narrativa det'mi. Voprosy psikholingvistiki [Interactive component in the mechanism of generation of narrative by children]. Voprosy Psykholynhvystyky, 1(35), 115–125). https://doi.org/10.30982/2077-5911-2018-35-1-115-125
Bauer, J. & McAdams, D. (2010). Eudaimonic growth: Narrative growth goals predict increases in ego development and subjective well-being 3 years later. Developmental Psychology, 46(4), 761–772. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019654
Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
De Fina, A. (2020). Doing Narrative Analysis from a Narratives-as-Practices Perspective. Narrative Inquiry, 17, 32–45. https://doi.org//10.1075/ni.20067.def
Frank, St. L. & Christiansen, M. (2018). Hierarchical and sequential processing of language. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(9), 1213–1218. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1424347
Harre, R. (2002). Cognitive Science. A Philosophical Introduction. Sage Publications.
Hothorn, Т., Hornik, К. & Zeileis, A. (2006). Unbiased Recursive Partitioning: A Conditional Inference Framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 15(3), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1198/106186006X133933
Mitchell, T. R. & Braham, L. G. (2011). The Psychological Treatment Needs of Deaf Mental Health Patients in High-Secure Settings: A Review of the Literature. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10(2), 92–106. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/14999013.2011.577135
Reagan, Т., Matlins, P. & Pielick, D. (2021) Deaf epistemology, sign language and the education of deaf children. Educational Studies, 57(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2021.1878178
Sarbin, T. (1986). Narrative psychology: the storied nature of human conduct. Harvard University Press.
Stephens, C. & Breheny, M. (2015). Narrative Analysis in Psychological Research: An Integrated Approach to Interpreting Stories. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 10, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2011.586103
Van Dijk, Т. (2008). Philosophy of Action and Theory of Narrative. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Vernon, M. & Andrews, J. (2010). The Psychology of Deafness. Longman.
Westbrook, D., Kennerley, H., & Kirk, J. (2007). An Introduction to Cognitive Behavioural Therapy. Sage Publications.
Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis. Sage. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781849208765